Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can a Swift/Immediate Action be Used as a Standard Action?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Atavar" data-source="post: 3992906" data-attributes="member: 7136"><p>There is an item in the Magic Item Compendium (belt of battle perhaps?) that uses charges (as a swift action) to give yourself extra actions in a round. I believe one charge gives you a move equivalent action, two charges give you a standard action, and three charges give you a full-round action.</p><p></p><p>So, for example, in one round you could:</p><p></p><p>1. Move into position (move action)</p><p></p><p>2. Cast a spell with a casting time of one standard action (standard action)</p><p></p><p>3. Spend two charges on your belt to give yourself another standard action (swift action)</p><p></p><p>4. Cast another spell with a casting time of one standard action (standard action)</p><p></p><p>But one of my characters wants to cast a spell requiring a swift action at step four, not a spell requiring a standard action. His argument is that a standard action takes longer than a swift action, so the belt should allow him to take a swift action at step four rather than a standard action.</p><p></p><p>However, the item doesn't explicitly allow a user to grant himself a swift action--only a move, standard, or full-round action. I argued that swift actions are not interchangeable with standard actions, and thus I ruled against him originally.</p><p></p><p>So, given all of the above as an example, does the RAW support the player's being allowed to use a swift action at step four, and if not, would you still allow it, and why?</p><p></p><p>Thanks again,</p><p></p><p>Atavar</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Atavar, post: 3992906, member: 7136"] There is an item in the Magic Item Compendium (belt of battle perhaps?) that uses charges (as a swift action) to give yourself extra actions in a round. I believe one charge gives you a move equivalent action, two charges give you a standard action, and three charges give you a full-round action. So, for example, in one round you could: 1. Move into position (move action) 2. Cast a spell with a casting time of one standard action (standard action) 3. Spend two charges on your belt to give yourself another standard action (swift action) 4. Cast another spell with a casting time of one standard action (standard action) But one of my characters wants to cast a spell requiring a swift action at step four, not a spell requiring a standard action. His argument is that a standard action takes longer than a swift action, so the belt should allow him to take a swift action at step four rather than a standard action. However, the item doesn't explicitly allow a user to grant himself a swift action--only a move, standard, or full-round action. I argued that swift actions are not interchangeable with standard actions, and thus I ruled against him originally. So, given all of the above as an example, does the RAW support the player's being allowed to use a swift action at step four, and if not, would you still allow it, and why? Thanks again, Atavar [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can a Swift/Immediate Action be Used as a Standard Action?
Top