Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="LokiDR" data-source="post: 2687586" data-attributes="member: 6239">That is slightly more complex.&nbsp; Yes, the spell stays on the same inititive as the cast was on when cast.&nbsp; However, there is still no need for check of 'end of round'.&nbsp; If you happen to use character cards, you could just make one for the spell and tick it off.If money is held as constant, they could still do just that, just have more wands to deal with.&nbsp; The wands they buy will just have fewer charges and they will run out faster.&nbsp; 1 wand (40 charges) = 4 wands (10 charges).&nbsp; I haven't changed the money at all, I've just spent it more wisely.That satisfies Ad Hoc Simultenaity better than simply declaring a wand can only be used once a round.&nbsp; I'd ad hoc differently, but that's why its ad hoc.&nbsp; Honestly, I don't think you will really see more than two uses in a round unless someone was trying to exploit the rule.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="LokiDR, post: 2687586, member: 6239"] That is slightly more complex. Yes, the spell stays on the same inititive as the cast was on when cast. However, there is still no need for check of 'end of round'. If you happen to use character cards, you could just make one for the spell and tick it off. If money is held as constant, they could still do just that, just have more wands to deal with. The wands they buy will just have fewer charges and they will run out faster. 1 wand (40 charges) = 4 wands (10 charges). I haven't changed the money at all, I've just spent it more wisely. That satisfies Ad Hoc Simultenaity better than simply declaring a wand can only be used once a round. I'd ad hoc differently, but that's why its ad hoc. Honestly, I don't think you will really see more than two uses in a round unless someone was trying to exploit the rule. [/QUOTE]

Verification