Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can a wand be used more than once per round?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lord Pendragon" data-source="post: 2687667" data-attributes="member: 707"><p>Ah. I see what you're saying, though I don't know for whom it would be true. The action that you believe would break the flow of continuous actions consists of drawing a line on the list of combatants I keep, and noting that line every time we come to it. It doesn't break any flow at all. Or at least, it wouldn't in theory, as admittedly I've never had to worry about several players trying to cheese a wand.I wasn't responding to your kobolds, and nowhere am I arguing that the wand exploit is <em>overpowered</em>. I'm arguing that it breaks believability, and can be easily dealth with with a RAW solution, which I use.The wand can be passed around, sure. It just can't be used several times simultaneously.I have no problem with such feats. And, were two PCs to each have such a feat, I'd allow them to each use the same wand in a round, since they've taken a feat to halve the time it takes to activate one. (I might require a dex check if they decide to each use one wand, then simultaneously exchange wands, but it'd be doable.)I disagree. If two or three people can use the same wand in the same period of time, then one person should be able to do the same, because it obviously only takes 1/2 or 1/3 of a round to use a wand. That's not the way it works RAW, barring feats. A wand takes a standard action to use, and there's not enough time in the remaining move action to use it again.The analogy has absolutely no bearing on the issue at hand, because using a wand is not an instantaneous action which requires no concentration, like firing a gun. If it were, it'd be a Swift Action, not a Standard Action.The speed of the ball has nothing to do with it. Let's assume that bouncing the ball takes roughly 4 seconds (more than half the 6 second round, which is fitting since a standard action can be used to perform a move, but a move action cannot be used to perform a standard action.) And throwing the ball to another guy only takes 1 second. So the first person bounces the ball, then throws it. 5 seconds have passed. Now the second guy has the ball. He starts to bounce it, but he's only 1/4 of the way through when the 6 seconds are up. Two guys cannot bounce the same ball in six seconds.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lord Pendragon, post: 2687667, member: 707"] Ah. I see what you're saying, though I don't know for whom it would be true. The action that you believe would break the flow of continuous actions consists of drawing a line on the list of combatants I keep, and noting that line every time we come to it. It doesn't break any flow at all. Or at least, it wouldn't in theory, as admittedly I've never had to worry about several players trying to cheese a wand.I wasn't responding to your kobolds, and nowhere am I arguing that the wand exploit is [i]overpowered[/i]. I'm arguing that it breaks believability, and can be easily dealth with with a RAW solution, which I use.The wand can be passed around, sure. It just can't be used several times simultaneously.I have no problem with such feats. And, were two PCs to each have such a feat, I'd allow them to each use the same wand in a round, since they've taken a feat to halve the time it takes to activate one. (I might require a dex check if they decide to each use one wand, then simultaneously exchange wands, but it'd be doable.)I disagree. If two or three people can use the same wand in the same period of time, then one person should be able to do the same, because it obviously only takes 1/2 or 1/3 of a round to use a wand. That's not the way it works RAW, barring feats. A wand takes a standard action to use, and there's not enough time in the remaining move action to use it again.The analogy has absolutely no bearing on the issue at hand, because using a wand is not an instantaneous action which requires no concentration, like firing a gun. If it were, it'd be a Swift Action, not a Standard Action.The speed of the ball has nothing to do with it. Let's assume that bouncing the ball takes roughly 4 seconds (more than half the 6 second round, which is fitting since a standard action can be used to perform a move, but a move action cannot be used to perform a standard action.) And throwing the ball to another guy only takes 1 second. So the first person bounces the ball, then throws it. 5 seconds have passed. Now the second guy has the ball. He starts to bounce it, but he's only 1/4 of the way through when the 6 seconds are up. Two guys cannot bounce the same ball in six seconds. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can a wand be used more than once per round?
Top