Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6307324" data-attributes="member: 2525">And I think if that was your point, you should have said it.  Instead, you repeatedly told people their experience was wrong, and then said we were mis-remembering, or the fighters were not built well or played well.  So yeah I am pretty sure I was interpreting your responses correctly.First, you did say (repeatedly) people were "wrong" when they told you their experience.  Second, it's looking like you might have been wrong on your averages.You didn't suggest "peoples" memories are wrong, you said MY memory was wrong for disagreeing with you.  I keep a story hour for the game I am talking about, you are welcome to check it for accuracy.  I am right on this and you are wrong - which is not amazing as I am speaking from direct knowledge and you're speaking from pure speculation.And now that the numbers back up my experience, where it was just proved out at levels 1-4, which is all we've played, the rogue SHOULD be doing more damage, I hope now you'll accept you were wrong to automatically assume my experiences were incorrect and that it was a sign of mis-remembering or the fighters and ranger not being built as well.  Instead, it was a flaw in your assumptions, and you never asked what levels we were playing and should have.None of which would have been an issue at all if you hadn't been so damn aggressive in your tone this whole time.</blockquote>