Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can an elf rogue be a decent archer in (Basic) D&D 5th edition?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6307993" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>You are wrong. I am a fan of 4e, and played it regularly from day one as well. Indeed, I was held up sometimes as a poster-child for 4e fandom at EnWorld's sister-board, CircvsMaximvs. I am of course aware of Page 42, and I did not have your experience with it. Page 42 is for the DM to adjudicate something and not on the player's character sheets. In my experience players looked at their cards and decided what to do most turns, and usually didn't think outside those cards unless prodded to do so by the DM. There were just so many options the players could choose from based on their character sheets that the thought of considering yet more options outside their character sheets far too often didn't occur to them. Glad your experienced differed, but it was not my experience with 4e. </p><p></p><p>It's also not the point of my post though. I've never been a basher of any edition of D&D, and nothing I said implied anyone needs to defend 4e in this respect. I loved 4e, and I think overall it was a great game, and this was not some hidden agenda of mine to trigger defensiveness over 4e in anyone. I was just explaining a change in our games from 4e to 5e, which reminded me of 1e and 2e and B/X games from long ago.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think it does actively encourage making rules up. And if you look on this board, on the WOTC boards, on RPG.net, and on TheRPGSite, you will find one very consistent, very common praise of 5e is the very thing I am talking about - that the players and DM feel less contained by the rules and more free to choose options based on their imagination. If that is not your experience playing 5e (and I tried to ask you what your experience was and you got offended, I am not sure why) then I am sorry. But, I don't think I am alone in saying that.</p><p></p><p>Is it really so offensive that I ask you "Have you played a rogue much with the current playtest rules"? I don't think that's an offensive thing to ask at all. I am noting a change between how the game plays in reality, and what you can easily factor based on math. It's a fair question to ask a person's experience with the former, when commenting on that very thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 6307993, member: 2525"] You are wrong. I am a fan of 4e, and played it regularly from day one as well. Indeed, I was held up sometimes as a poster-child for 4e fandom at EnWorld's sister-board, CircvsMaximvs. I am of course aware of Page 42, and I did not have your experience with it. Page 42 is for the DM to adjudicate something and not on the player's character sheets. In my experience players looked at their cards and decided what to do most turns, and usually didn't think outside those cards unless prodded to do so by the DM. There were just so many options the players could choose from based on their character sheets that the thought of considering yet more options outside their character sheets far too often didn't occur to them. Glad your experienced differed, but it was not my experience with 4e. It's also not the point of my post though. I've never been a basher of any edition of D&D, and nothing I said implied anyone needs to defend 4e in this respect. I loved 4e, and I think overall it was a great game, and this was not some hidden agenda of mine to trigger defensiveness over 4e in anyone. I was just explaining a change in our games from 4e to 5e, which reminded me of 1e and 2e and B/X games from long ago. I think it does actively encourage making rules up. And if you look on this board, on the WOTC boards, on RPG.net, and on TheRPGSite, you will find one very consistent, very common praise of 5e is the very thing I am talking about - that the players and DM feel less contained by the rules and more free to choose options based on their imagination. If that is not your experience playing 5e (and I tried to ask you what your experience was and you got offended, I am not sure why) then I am sorry. But, I don't think I am alone in saying that. Is it really so offensive that I ask you "Have you played a rogue much with the current playtest rules"? I don't think that's an offensive thing to ask at all. I am noting a change between how the game plays in reality, and what you can easily factor based on math. It's a fair question to ask a person's experience with the former, when commenting on that very thing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can an elf rogue be a decent archer in (Basic) D&D 5th edition?
Top