Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can an elf rogue be a decent archer in (Basic) D&D 5th edition?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6311374" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>No, I hear claims like that all the time regarding basketball stats from newbie basketball fans. They look at things like points scored, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, and then when someone brings up things which are much more difficult to quantity as a number (but which have real impact on the game for anyone who watches the game) like "ability to create your own shot" and "harassing defense" and "get's into passing lanes" and "always in the right spot" and such, they ignore them because it's harder to put a number on them.</p><p></p><p>And yet, those types of things existed in baseball, and people did the same thing there, until finally they WERE able to put numbers on them. And things changed - drastically - in the entire sport. Because those formerly-difficult-to-quantify things were having a huge impact on the game all along, and most people knew it by simply looking but they were having a hard time putting a number on it. And now, it even arguably changed who won the world series. </p><p></p><p>The ability to move more than your foe, to take advantage of cover and concealment and the ability to hide and move silently, these all are quantifiable things. You could calculate the percentages for how often it comes up in an average scenario (using a statistically relevant number of published scenarios or something), the average decrease in damage taken, or the average increase in damage done to the foe over time, and the ratios of damage done to damage received, etc.. </p><p></p><p>It's just that they are harder to quantify than average DPR from a long sword, or armor class. But everyone who plays the game sees the power of those other things, and knows they are having significant impacts on the game. </p><p></p><p>It is perfectly acceptable to say "I might not know what impact this has on average damage, but I know, and everyone who plays the game knows, it has a huge impact on the game quite often". That's not an unreasonable thing to do. </p><p></p><p>The unreasonable thing to do is to pretend that, because you're having a hard time pinning a number on an ability, that no claims should be made about that thing concerning the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 6311374, member: 2525"] No, I hear claims like that all the time regarding basketball stats from newbie basketball fans. They look at things like points scored, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, and then when someone brings up things which are much more difficult to quantity as a number (but which have real impact on the game for anyone who watches the game) like "ability to create your own shot" and "harassing defense" and "get's into passing lanes" and "always in the right spot" and such, they ignore them because it's harder to put a number on them. And yet, those types of things existed in baseball, and people did the same thing there, until finally they WERE able to put numbers on them. And things changed - drastically - in the entire sport. Because those formerly-difficult-to-quantify things were having a huge impact on the game all along, and most people knew it by simply looking but they were having a hard time putting a number on it. And now, it even arguably changed who won the world series. The ability to move more than your foe, to take advantage of cover and concealment and the ability to hide and move silently, these all are quantifiable things. You could calculate the percentages for how often it comes up in an average scenario (using a statistically relevant number of published scenarios or something), the average decrease in damage taken, or the average increase in damage done to the foe over time, and the ratios of damage done to damage received, etc.. It's just that they are harder to quantify than average DPR from a long sword, or armor class. But everyone who plays the game sees the power of those other things, and knows they are having significant impacts on the game. It is perfectly acceptable to say "I might not know what impact this has on average damage, but I know, and everyone who plays the game knows, it has a huge impact on the game quite often". That's not an unreasonable thing to do. The unreasonable thing to do is to pretend that, because you're having a hard time pinning a number on an ability, that no claims should be made about that thing concerning the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can an elf rogue be a decent archer in (Basic) D&D 5th edition?
Top