Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="El Mahdi" data-source="post: 4574189" data-attributes="member: 59506"><p>I'm of the philosophy that armor doesn't inherently affect the casting of spells, at least not simply because of it's presence or construction/materials.  I do feel that heavy armor can restrict a spellcaster simply through it's weight and encumberance (anyone who has ever worn body armor can relate).  If you aren't used to it, even a simple Kevlar Vest can seriously restrict your actions and fatigue you very easily.  This could lead the caster to be just a little too slow on the draw, or unable to effectively aim or concentrate - all affects that would handicap the spellcaster attempt.  I figure that it's only fair for a spellcaster to have to learn proficiency in armor (by taking a feat), just like any other class would have to in order to avoid penalties.  But other than that, I don't feel that armour should restrict the channeling or casting of magic (unless you created a material that was specifically intended to do just that).</p></blockquote><p></p>