Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can I Ignore An Opponent?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Storm Raven" data-source="post: 2773962" data-attributes="member: 307"><p>Nope. That's the difference between an enemy and an ally. If you cannot even figure out that distinction, then you are destined to never be able to understand the rules.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You do not lose your shield modifier to Dexterity when you are flat-footed. And you are correct - your Dexterity bonus is set to 0. However, you miss my point, if you were truly unable to react to anything your opponent did when you were flat-footed then your Dexterity itself would be treated as if it were 0 - just as it is when you are helpless, and you would have a -5 penalty to your AC as a result of your inability to react <em>at all</em>.</p><p></p><p>This is, however, clearly not the case when you are flat-footed. You simply lose the benefits of a high Dexterity when you are flat-footed (and may be sneak attacked). This implies <em>some</em> level of responsiveness to the attacks, one which is certainly higher than if one were to be actively ignoring an opponent.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not confusing them. They are simply the same condition. A flat-footed creature retains some ability to react. A creature completely unable to react does not.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, it isn't. Because if it was, then your Dexterity would be 0 when you are flat-footed. Your Dexterity modifier would be -5, not merely 0. Basically, your argument holds no water, because you forget that a flat-footed opponent still retains some ability to react, wheras an opponent who completely ignores you cannot - otherwise he would be distracted and your ally would gain a flanking bonus.</p><p></p><p>Either you are paying enough attention to an enemy to react to him, even minimally, and thus both flanking enemies gain a flanking bonus, or you are not, and you are completly unable to react to anything your enemy does, and thus you are helpless with respect to that enemy. You cannot have it both ways. You are trying to meta-game the system by retaining a defense against an enemy but not suffering the negative consequences of having that defense. That is a dishonest position to take.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Storm Raven, post: 2773962, member: 307"] Nope. That's the difference between an enemy and an ally. If you cannot even figure out that distinction, then you are destined to never be able to understand the rules. [i][/i] You do not lose your shield modifier to Dexterity when you are flat-footed. And you are correct - your Dexterity bonus is set to 0. However, you miss my point, if you were truly unable to react to anything your opponent did when you were flat-footed then your Dexterity itself would be treated as if it were 0 - just as it is when you are helpless, and you would have a -5 penalty to your AC as a result of your inability to react [i]at all[/i]. This is, however, clearly not the case when you are flat-footed. You simply lose the benefits of a high Dexterity when you are flat-footed (and may be sneak attacked). This implies [i]some[/i] level of responsiveness to the attacks, one which is certainly higher than if one were to be actively ignoring an opponent. [i][/i] I'm not confusing them. They are simply the same condition. A flat-footed creature retains some ability to react. A creature completely unable to react does not. [i][/i] No, it isn't. Because if it was, then your Dexterity would be 0 when you are flat-footed. Your Dexterity modifier would be -5, not merely 0. Basically, your argument holds no water, because you forget that a flat-footed opponent still retains some ability to react, wheras an opponent who completely ignores you cannot - otherwise he would be distracted and your ally would gain a flanking bonus. Either you are paying enough attention to an enemy to react to him, even minimally, and thus both flanking enemies gain a flanking bonus, or you are not, and you are completly unable to react to anything your enemy does, and thus you are helpless with respect to that enemy. You cannot have it both ways. You are trying to meta-game the system by retaining a defense against an enemy but not suffering the negative consequences of having that defense. That is a dishonest position to take. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can I Ignore An Opponent?
Top