Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can I Ignore An Opponent?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Man in the Funny Hat" data-source="post: 2780117" data-attributes="member: 32740"><p>My point, ultimately, is that if you are going to allow something like this at all it should be as a feat. Look at Improved Uncanny Dodge which prevents a character from being flanked. It is an ability that barbarians don't get until 5th level and rogues don't get until 8th, either of which can then still be sneak attacked by a rogue that is 4 levels higher. It makes no attempt to explain how/why it works other than the name - an improved dodging ability. It does not savagely mistreat the concept of maintaining a basic minimal defense against all attackers at all times. Note also that it still does not provide an absolute elimination of penalties to being flanked as it can be overcome by the right opponent - and the type of opponent most able and most reliant upon the sort of advantage that flanking gives you.</p><p></p><p>While I would be HIGHLY reluctant to allow all characters access to what ought to be a protected class ability (I am personally a big believer in maintaining a strong distinction between classes by doing so) if you wanted to allow access to all you could do a lot worse than to use that as your basis and NOT the notion of "Ignoring" an attacker which continues to be unrealistic and ruthlessly destroys my own suspension of disbelief. For that I would still aver that the penalty ought to be rather more severe than merely being flat-footed. Being subject to coup de gras is still far more reasonable given the base concept of "ignoring" the attacker. Your house rule may work for you (and good on ya) but IMO its unacceptable, all the more so for the admitted rarity with which it should ever even come up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Man in the Funny Hat, post: 2780117, member: 32740"] My point, ultimately, is that if you are going to allow something like this at all it should be as a feat. Look at Improved Uncanny Dodge which prevents a character from being flanked. It is an ability that barbarians don't get until 5th level and rogues don't get until 8th, either of which can then still be sneak attacked by a rogue that is 4 levels higher. It makes no attempt to explain how/why it works other than the name - an improved dodging ability. It does not savagely mistreat the concept of maintaining a basic minimal defense against all attackers at all times. Note also that it still does not provide an absolute elimination of penalties to being flanked as it can be overcome by the right opponent - and the type of opponent most able and most reliant upon the sort of advantage that flanking gives you. While I would be HIGHLY reluctant to allow all characters access to what ought to be a protected class ability (I am personally a big believer in maintaining a strong distinction between classes by doing so) if you wanted to allow access to all you could do a lot worse than to use that as your basis and NOT the notion of "Ignoring" an attacker which continues to be unrealistic and ruthlessly destroys my own suspension of disbelief. For that I would still aver that the penalty ought to be rather more severe than merely being flat-footed. Being subject to coup de gras is still far more reasonable given the base concept of "ignoring" the attacker. Your house rule may work for you (and good on ya) but IMO its unacceptable, all the more so for the admitted rarity with which it should ever even come up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can I Ignore An Opponent?
Top