Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can I Ignore An Opponent?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 2782190" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p><strong>The Argument as I understand it Part III</strong></p><p></p><p>(2) What exactly do the current flanking rules represent?</p><p></p><p>Flanking is not simple two combatants helping each other; it is an advantage based upon the relative position of the combatants. </p><p></p><p>The Aid Another action allows two combatants to help each other, and stacks with flanking.</p><p></p><p>Some previous versions of D&D had facing, and the relative bonuses characters gained where based upon how easy it was for the defender to protect various faces. These versions of D&D. In these versions of the game, you could turn so as to provide different levels of defense against different opponents. Although generally considered too complex a mechanism for 3rd Ed and 3.5, this recently resurfaced as an option in <em>Unearthed Arcana</em>.</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">The standard d20 combat rules intentionally ignore the direction a creature faces. The rules assume that creatures are constantly moving and shifting within their spaces, looking in all directions during a fight. In this variant, facing—the direction your head and body are pointing—makes a big difference in how you move and fight. </p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">This variant makes combat more complex, but it opens up new strategic options for PCs and monsters alike. It’s a good choice if your group relishes the tactical complexity of d20 combat and doesn’t mind spending a lot of time duking it out with the bad guys. It won’t change the power level of your game. </p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">This variant supersedes the standard rules for flanking and creates new conditions for the rogue’s use of the sneak attack ability. </p><p></p><p>In UA, " If you’re attacking from a foe’s flank area (or the squares beyond it, if you have a reach or ranged weapon), you get a +2 bonus on the attack roll. You don’t need anyone opposite you on the other side of your foe. If you’re attacking from a foe’s rear area (or the squares beyond it), you get a +4 bonus on the attack roll. " Under this system, "A rogue can strike for sneak attack damage whenever her foe is flat-footed or whenever she’s attacking with a melee weapon from the foe’s rear area. She doesn’t need anyone directly opposite her to get the extra damage." (Quotes from the Hypertext SRD, <a href="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/adventuring/combatFacing.htm#facingAndAttacking" target="_blank">http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/adventuring/combatFacing.htm#facingAndAttacking</a>)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Some might be exused, therefore, for thinking that it is the necessity of the flanked character turning to deal with multiple attackers that grants the bonus to hit. I.e., the character is <em>flanked</em> because he must expose his <em>flank</em>.</p><p></p><p>From Knighthood, Chivalry & Tournament Glossary of Terms (<a href="http://www.chronique.com/Library/Glossaries/glossary-KCT/gloss_f.htm" target="_blank">http://www.chronique.com/Library/Glossaries/glossary-KCT/gloss_f.htm</a>)</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>Flank: </strong> The end of a military line, a weak point on one side or the other. Traditionally, the attacker’s right flank is weaker than the left, because the shield is generally wielded in the left hand. To gain an enemy’s flank is a common tactical objective, because the unit so engaged is then pressed on more than one front, and the resulting confusion can often destroy a unit or army’s cohesion. </p><p></p><p>Of course, combatants can and do take advantage of flanking by also Aiding Another, and by taking turns using Full Attack and Full Defense. Wolves are particularly well known for the tactic of attacking as soon as their victim turns to face the previous attacker. This particular tactic was put into game terms in 2nd Edition AD&D as "Wolf Pack Tactics" in the <em>Complete Fighter's Handbook</em>. It offered then, as it offers now, additional tactical advantages beyond those of mere flanking.</p><p></p><p>Based upon the foregoing, especially upon the clarifications in UA, it would seem as though flanking is a situational advantage based upon the flanked character being unable to provide his or her best defense against properly positioned opponents.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 2782190, member: 18280"] [b]The Argument as I understand it Part III[/b] (2) What exactly do the current flanking rules represent? Flanking is not simple two combatants helping each other; it is an advantage based upon the relative position of the combatants. The Aid Another action allows two combatants to help each other, and stacks with flanking. Some previous versions of D&D had facing, and the relative bonuses characters gained where based upon how easy it was for the defender to protect various faces. These versions of D&D. In these versions of the game, you could turn so as to provide different levels of defense against different opponents. Although generally considered too complex a mechanism for 3rd Ed and 3.5, this recently resurfaced as an option in [I]Unearthed Arcana[/I]. [INDENT]The standard d20 combat rules intentionally ignore the direction a creature faces. The rules assume that creatures are constantly moving and shifting within their spaces, looking in all directions during a fight. In this variant, facing—the direction your head and body are pointing—makes a big difference in how you move and fight. This variant makes combat more complex, but it opens up new strategic options for PCs and monsters alike. It’s a good choice if your group relishes the tactical complexity of d20 combat and doesn’t mind spending a lot of time duking it out with the bad guys. It won’t change the power level of your game. This variant supersedes the standard rules for flanking and creates new conditions for the rogue’s use of the sneak attack ability. [/INDENT] In UA, " If you’re attacking from a foe’s flank area (or the squares beyond it, if you have a reach or ranged weapon), you get a +2 bonus on the attack roll. You don’t need anyone opposite you on the other side of your foe. If you’re attacking from a foe’s rear area (or the squares beyond it), you get a +4 bonus on the attack roll. " Under this system, "A rogue can strike for sneak attack damage whenever her foe is flat-footed or whenever she’s attacking with a melee weapon from the foe’s rear area. She doesn’t need anyone directly opposite her to get the extra damage." (Quotes from the Hypertext SRD, [url]http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/adventuring/combatFacing.htm#facingAndAttacking[/url]) Some might be exused, therefore, for thinking that it is the necessity of the flanked character turning to deal with multiple attackers that grants the bonus to hit. I.e., the character is [I]flanked[/I] because he must expose his [I]flank[/I]. From Knighthood, Chivalry & Tournament Glossary of Terms ([url]http://www.chronique.com/Library/Glossaries/glossary-KCT/gloss_f.htm[/url]) [INDENT][B]Flank: [/B] The end of a military line, a weak point on one side or the other. Traditionally, the attacker’s right flank is weaker than the left, because the shield is generally wielded in the left hand. To gain an enemy’s flank is a common tactical objective, because the unit so engaged is then pressed on more than one front, and the resulting confusion can often destroy a unit or army’s cohesion. [/INDENT] Of course, combatants can and do take advantage of flanking by also Aiding Another, and by taking turns using Full Attack and Full Defense. Wolves are particularly well known for the tactic of attacking as soon as their victim turns to face the previous attacker. This particular tactic was put into game terms in 2nd Edition AD&D as "Wolf Pack Tactics" in the [I]Complete Fighter's Handbook[/I]. It offered then, as it offers now, additional tactical advantages beyond those of mere flanking. Based upon the foregoing, especially upon the clarifications in UA, it would seem as though flanking is a situational advantage based upon the flanked character being unable to provide his or her best defense against properly positioned opponents. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can I Ignore An Opponent?
Top