Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can I use action surge in the middle of another action (between attacks when attacking with extra attack)?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest 7037866" data-source="post: 9258238"><p>LOL, please STOP, just STOP! You are making me LAUGH SO HARD!!! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":ROFLMAO:" title="ROFL :ROFLMAO:" data-smilie="18"data-shortname=":ROFLMAO:" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":ROFLMAO:" title="ROFL :ROFLMAO:" data-smilie="18"data-shortname=":ROFLMAO:" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":ROFLMAO:" title="ROFL :ROFLMAO:" data-smilie="18"data-shortname=":ROFLMAO:" /></p><p></p><p>Seriously, this response is just ridiculous. There IS a rule explicitly stating what racial traits are, and who gets what. Please don't waste my time further.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I can see how you might think this, but again this is about movement and actions, not about actions and (bonus) actions. It might indicatate that to you, but that isn't what it actually says concerning actions and actions. The section on Breaking Up Your Move says you can move, take your action, and move again. You don't have to move and then act, or act and then move (you <em>can</em> of course!), which is more what your quote (bolded) would indicate.</p><p></p><p></p><p>True. I agree it is an issue which the designers overlooked. It has come up numerous times, such as Shield Master, which the designers have flip-flopped on. First is was you have to complete the Attack action before you can bonus action shove. Then it became you have to take the Attack action, allowing you to bonus action shove after just one attack, and finish attacking after the shove.</p><p></p><p>All of this simply returns me to my initial position: there is no rule in either direction, so it really is just up to the DM...</p><p></p><p></p><p>No worries. I feel your posts are in good faith and I wouldn't see this as a "gotcha" anyway. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>My ruling would be "no" simply because the spell (like <em>eldritch blast</em> above) is instantaneous. I wouldn't allow someone to move between the separate rays of <em>eldritch blast</em>, either. The section on Moving Between Attacks is about "weapon" attacks, not spell attacks.</p><p></p><p>Now, its interesting, JC has stated the rays in EB were meant to be completed consecutively. So, if you hit a target and kill it, the next blast isn't wasted and can target a different foe. <em>Chain Lightning</em> allows you to pick up to to three targets after the first, and all targets are hit instantly. There is literally no time to Action Surge for another action before the spell is resolved.</p><p></p><p>The Attack action isn't instantaneous IMO. Sure, nothing says it "isn't", and nothing says it "is", so DMs and Players get to run things in whatever way makes the most sense to them.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And here is a perfect response in the other direction from mine. Totally valid and if I played with such a DM it wouldn't bother me at all.</p><p></p><p>As you know from my (I believe) first post, not every situation or scenario is covered in the rules. Logical use of the time permitted in the game, use of features, spells, etc. break up that time in a way which just has to make sense (and FUN!) to those who play. That's all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 7037866, post: 9258238"] LOL, please STOP, just STOP! You are making me LAUGH SO HARD!!! :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: Seriously, this response is just ridiculous. There IS a rule explicitly stating what racial traits are, and who gets what. Please don't waste my time further. I can see how you might think this, but again this is about movement and actions, not about actions and (bonus) actions. It might indicatate that to you, but that isn't what it actually says concerning actions and actions. The section on Breaking Up Your Move says you can move, take your action, and move again. You don't have to move and then act, or act and then move (you [I]can[/I] of course!), which is more what your quote (bolded) would indicate. True. I agree it is an issue which the designers overlooked. It has come up numerous times, such as Shield Master, which the designers have flip-flopped on. First is was you have to complete the Attack action before you can bonus action shove. Then it became you have to take the Attack action, allowing you to bonus action shove after just one attack, and finish attacking after the shove. All of this simply returns me to my initial position: there is no rule in either direction, so it really is just up to the DM... No worries. I feel your posts are in good faith and I wouldn't see this as a "gotcha" anyway. :) My ruling would be "no" simply because the spell (like [I]eldritch blast[/I] above) is instantaneous. I wouldn't allow someone to move between the separate rays of [I]eldritch blast[/I], either. The section on Moving Between Attacks is about "weapon" attacks, not spell attacks. Now, its interesting, JC has stated the rays in EB were meant to be completed consecutively. So, if you hit a target and kill it, the next blast isn't wasted and can target a different foe. [I]Chain Lightning[/I] allows you to pick up to to three targets after the first, and all targets are hit instantly. There is literally no time to Action Surge for another action before the spell is resolved. The Attack action isn't instantaneous IMO. Sure, nothing says it "isn't", and nothing says it "is", so DMs and Players get to run things in whatever way makes the most sense to them. And here is a perfect response in the other direction from mine. Totally valid and if I played with such a DM it wouldn't bother me at all. As you know from my (I believe) first post, not every situation or scenario is covered in the rules. Logical use of the time permitted in the game, use of features, spells, etc. break up that time in a way which just has to make sense (and FUN!) to those who play. That's all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can I use action surge in the middle of another action (between attacks when attacking with extra attack)?
Top