Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9260646" data-attributes="member: 7030563">There is no explicit rule stating that a PC walks upright on his feet and not on their hands either, but that doesn't mean PCs are not allowed to walk on their feet.&nbsp; The only &quot;explcilt&quot; rules for movement are jumping, swimming and climbing and even those are not explicit as to what your hands and feet are doing when you do them.There is a specific rule allowing action surge.&nbsp; There is a specific rule regarding extra attack (actually several of them).&nbsp; This seems to be compliant with both of those rules as they are written.I am the one who asked the question to start with, and I am not wed to the idea that it is allowed RAW (although I am leamning that way), but the explanation you have made regarding &quot;interrupting an action&quot; and &quot;explicit wording&quot; makes no sense at all because you are saying something is not RAW unless it is explicitly stated and then you are turning around and citing something as a reason that is itself not explicitly stated.Further as I noted above if you subscribe to this you can't make one attack with a hand axe and another with a longsword because it is not specifically mentioned.&nbsp; This is a very narrow view of RAW I think.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 9260646, member: 7030563"] There is no explicit rule stating that a PC walks upright on his feet and not on their hands either, but that doesn't mean PCs are not allowed to walk on their feet. The only "explcilt" rules for movement are jumping, swimming and climbing and even those are not explicit as to what your hands and feet are doing when you do them. There is a specific rule allowing action surge. There is a specific rule regarding extra attack (actually several of them). This seems to be compliant with both of those rules as they are written. I am the one who asked the question to start with, and I am not wed to the idea that it is allowed RAW (although I am leamning that way), but the explanation you have made regarding [I]"interrupting an action" [/I]and "[I]explicit wording"[/I] makes no sense at all because you are saying something is not RAW unless it is explicitly stated and then you are turning around and citing something as a reason that is itself not explicitly stated. Further as I noted above if you subscribe to this you can't make one attack with a hand axe and another with a longsword because it is not specifically mentioned. This is a very narrow view of RAW I think. [/QUOTE]

Verification