Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 313417" data-attributes="member: 2011">I never act obtuse. I sometimes am obtuse due to lack of effort on my part, but I have little control over that. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I just am more open minded in interpretation in this case than you. Please do not use backhanded attempts at insults via the tired old qualifier &quot;no offense&quot;.It's a rule taken out of context.The rule is talking about real creatures. Yes, you can extrapolate that to mean illusionary creatures as well and that's ok.But, to state that it is the end all be all rule concerning the topic is invalid. Other people do not necessarily broaden the scope of rules on real creatures to always apply to illusionary ones.In fact, 3E is notorious for lacking in good rules for illusions and it is a wide open area for interpretation.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 313417, member: 2011"] I never [b]act[/b] obtuse. I sometimes am obtuse due to lack of effort on my part, but I have little control over that. :) I just am more open minded in interpretation in this case than you. Please do not use backhanded attempts at insults via the tired old qualifier "no offense". It's a rule taken out of context. The rule is talking about real creatures. Yes, you can extrapolate that to mean illusionary creatures as well and that's ok. But, to state that it is the end all be all rule concerning the topic is invalid. Other people do not necessarily broaden the scope of rules on real creatures to always apply to illusionary ones. In fact, 3E is notorious for lacking in good rules for illusions and it is a wide open area for interpretation. [/QUOTE]

Verification