Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can one player do an entire Skill Challenge?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Smeelbo" data-source="post: 4628631" data-attributes="member: 81898"><p>Unfortunately, the skill check system for 4E is <u>broken</u>.</p><p> </p><p>As printed in the current DMG, a level-appropriate skill challenge is roughly equivalent to flipping a number of coins with the aim of getting twice as many heads as tails. Obviously, this will fail almost all the time, and the more coin tosses, the more certain failure is. Apparently the errata'd skill challenge system has swung entirely the other way, and now success is almost entirely assured. Not very challenging.</p><p> </p><p>There are alternative challenge systems around, one of which the author promotes here in his forum signature.</p><p> </p><p>How I would do it is something more along the lines of this. The group agrees on an intent and a plan to fulfill that intent. The referee and the players then agree on the main skill to be tested, and the referee sets the DC based on how difficult he wants the test to be, then adds +5 to the DC to account for group effort. Each character besides the main tester proposes a skill test to effectively "assist" the main tester, the referee sets a DC for the assist, which may be higher than 10 depending on how effective the assistance is judged to be towards the end goal. Each successful assist adds +2 to the final test. Alternately, once could penalize any assist check that fails by 5 or more, and reward any assist check that succeeds by 5 or more.</p><p> </p><p>So for example, you are trying to impress the mayor so that he provides some equipment for your mission. This is a reasonable request, although the mayor is reluctant to spend many resources on unproven adventurers. The players plan to combine reasoning with the mayor with intimidations intended to demonstrate the power of the adventurers and the seriousness of the situation. The referee sets the main diplomacy test base DC at 20, with +5 for the group size, or DC25 total.</p><p> </p><p>The Warlord is the main tester, with Diplomacy +8.</p><p>The Rogue will assist with his Diplomacy of +3. This is a straightforward assist, so it is DC10.</p><p>The Ranger and the Fighter<em> "assist"</em> with Intimidates of +0 and +2 respectively. This is somewhat at cross purposes with the aim of diplomacy, but plausible, so the referee chooses DC13 for those <em>"assists."</em></p><p> </p><p>The Ranger and the Rogue succeed at their "assist checks" and so add +4 to the main test, for a total of +12 versus a DC25.</p><p> </p><p>Seems like a reasonable result to me, but I have not thought long and hard about this yet. But it does give a 40% chance of success, which seems far more fair than the results of either the published skill challenge system, or its errata.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Smeelbo</strong></p><p> </p><p><strong>EDIT:</strong> Found it! It's called <em>Obsidian</em>, and while I haven't tried it yet, it seems very well thought out. Here is the link:</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/4e-fan-creations-house-rules/241440-stalker0s-obsidian-skill-challenge-system-new-version-1-2-a.html" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/4e-fan-creations-house-rules/241440-stalker0s-obsidian-skill-challenge-system-new-version-1-2-a.html</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Smeelbo, post: 4628631, member: 81898"] Unfortunately, the skill check system for 4E is [U]broken[/U]. As printed in the current DMG, a level-appropriate skill challenge is roughly equivalent to flipping a number of coins with the aim of getting twice as many heads as tails. Obviously, this will fail almost all the time, and the more coin tosses, the more certain failure is. Apparently the errata'd skill challenge system has swung entirely the other way, and now success is almost entirely assured. Not very challenging. There are alternative challenge systems around, one of which the author promotes here in his forum signature. How I would do it is something more along the lines of this. The group agrees on an intent and a plan to fulfill that intent. The referee and the players then agree on the main skill to be tested, and the referee sets the DC based on how difficult he wants the test to be, then adds +5 to the DC to account for group effort. Each character besides the main tester proposes a skill test to effectively "assist" the main tester, the referee sets a DC for the assist, which may be higher than 10 depending on how effective the assistance is judged to be towards the end goal. Each successful assist adds +2 to the final test. Alternately, once could penalize any assist check that fails by 5 or more, and reward any assist check that succeeds by 5 or more. So for example, you are trying to impress the mayor so that he provides some equipment for your mission. This is a reasonable request, although the mayor is reluctant to spend many resources on unproven adventurers. The players plan to combine reasoning with the mayor with intimidations intended to demonstrate the power of the adventurers and the seriousness of the situation. The referee sets the main diplomacy test base DC at 20, with +5 for the group size, or DC25 total. The Warlord is the main tester, with Diplomacy +8. The Rogue will assist with his Diplomacy of +3. This is a straightforward assist, so it is DC10. The Ranger and the Fighter[I] "assist"[/I] with Intimidates of +0 and +2 respectively. This is somewhat at cross purposes with the aim of diplomacy, but plausible, so the referee chooses DC13 for those [I]"assists."[/I] The Ranger and the Rogue succeed at their "assist checks" and so add +4 to the main test, for a total of +12 versus a DC25. Seems like a reasonable result to me, but I have not thought long and hard about this yet. But it does give a 40% chance of success, which seems far more fair than the results of either the published skill challenge system, or its errata. [B]Smeelbo[/B] [B]EDIT:[/B] Found it! It's called [I]Obsidian[/I], and while I haven't tried it yet, it seems very well thought out. Here is the link: [URL]http://www.enworld.org/forum/4e-fan-creations-house-rules/241440-stalker0s-obsidian-skill-challenge-system-new-version-1-2-a.html[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can one player do an entire Skill Challenge?
Top