Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Can Quantum Entanglement surpass the speed of light
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="freyar" data-source="post: 5895942" data-attributes="member: 40227"><p>There are some elements of truth in that analogy, but I think it's going too far with how things change in time; the important point is a little more complicated and much, much weirder.</p><p></p><p>Since we've been talking about cake, I'll rephrase the photon experiment from earlier in terms of cake. Let's talk about simple cakes which have only two properties, the flavor of the actual cake, which can be chocolate or vanilla, and the flavor of the icing, which can also be chocolate or vanilla. Sorry if you don't like those flavors. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>Here is where the weirdness starts. In quantum mechanics, there are what we call "incompatible observables," meaning that you can't know them at the same time. In terms of our cake analogy, you can't know both the flavor of the icing and the flavor of the cake. In experimental terms, what this means is that, say you eat some of the icing, and it is vanilla. Then, if you eat a piece of the cake, half of the time it will be chocolate and half the time vanilla. But suppose you eat some vanilla icing on one cake, then eat some of the cake from that cake (it's vanilla too). Then eat some of the icing from that cake again. There is now a 50% chance that the icing has turned to chocolate! That's because you can't know the flavor of the cake and icing at the same time.</p><p></p><p>Actually, I suppose that's the 2nd bit of weirdness. The first bit is that the outcomes of experiments are always probabalistic; only the averages of a lot of identical experiments can be determined/predicted by calculations.</p><p></p><p>The entanglement issue is even weirder. In this experiment, we have two cakes. We know that (somehow), if cake A is chocolate, then cake B is vanilla (or vice versa) AND that if the icing on cake A is chocolate, then the icing on B is vanilla (or vice versa). So if I eat some of the icing on cake A and notice that it's chocolate, then anyone who eats the icing on B will taste vanilla (assuming nothing else happens to the cakes in the meantime), and it doesn't matter if there's time for me to send a light signal in between. Same thing if I eat the cake of A and you eat the cake of B. But if I eat the icing of A and you eat the cake of B, our "measurements" don't influence each other at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="freyar, post: 5895942, member: 40227"] There are some elements of truth in that analogy, but I think it's going too far with how things change in time; the important point is a little more complicated and much, much weirder. Since we've been talking about cake, I'll rephrase the photon experiment from earlier in terms of cake. Let's talk about simple cakes which have only two properties, the flavor of the actual cake, which can be chocolate or vanilla, and the flavor of the icing, which can also be chocolate or vanilla. Sorry if you don't like those flavors. :D Here is where the weirdness starts. In quantum mechanics, there are what we call "incompatible observables," meaning that you can't know them at the same time. In terms of our cake analogy, you can't know both the flavor of the icing and the flavor of the cake. In experimental terms, what this means is that, say you eat some of the icing, and it is vanilla. Then, if you eat a piece of the cake, half of the time it will be chocolate and half the time vanilla. But suppose you eat some vanilla icing on one cake, then eat some of the cake from that cake (it's vanilla too). Then eat some of the icing from that cake again. There is now a 50% chance that the icing has turned to chocolate! That's because you can't know the flavor of the cake and icing at the same time. Actually, I suppose that's the 2nd bit of weirdness. The first bit is that the outcomes of experiments are always probabalistic; only the averages of a lot of identical experiments can be determined/predicted by calculations. The entanglement issue is even weirder. In this experiment, we have two cakes. We know that (somehow), if cake A is chocolate, then cake B is vanilla (or vice versa) AND that if the icing on cake A is chocolate, then the icing on B is vanilla (or vice versa). So if I eat some of the icing on cake A and notice that it's chocolate, then anyone who eats the icing on B will taste vanilla (assuming nothing else happens to the cakes in the meantime), and it doesn't matter if there's time for me to send a light signal in between. Same thing if I eat the cake of A and you eat the cake of B. But if I eat the icing of A and you eat the cake of B, our "measurements" don't influence each other at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Can Quantum Entanglement surpass the speed of light
Top