Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jack Simth" data-source="post: 2876262" data-attributes="member: 29252">Personal ruling?1) Negates hiding; Scrying's &quot;...you can see and hear the subject...&quot; trumps Spot's &quot;Typically, your Spot check is opposed by the Hide check of the creature trying not to be seen.&quot;2) Does not necessarily negate Invisibility, due to Scrying's own limitation &quot;...the sensor has your full visual acuity, including any magical effects...&quot;So if the subject is visible, in a lit area, and you are a human wizard who casts Scrying, you can see the subjet quite clearly.&nbsp; If the subject is visible, in a totally dark area, and you're a human wizard who casts Scrying, you get a bunch of blackness.&nbsp; If you then cast Darkvision, you can see the subject.&nbsp; If the subject is invisible, you get the immediate surroundings, but not the subject (until you cast See Invisible).&nbsp; Et cetera.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jack Simth, post: 2876262, member: 29252"] Personal ruling? 1) Negates hiding; Scrying's "...you can see and hear the subject..." trumps Spot's "Typically, your Spot check is opposed by the Hide check of the creature trying not to be seen." 2) Does not necessarily negate Invisibility, due to Scrying's own limitation "...the sensor has your full visual acuity, including any magical effects..." So if the subject is visible, in a lit area, and you are a human wizard who casts Scrying, you can see the subjet quite clearly. If the subject is visible, in a totally dark area, and you're a human wizard who casts Scrying, you get a bunch of blackness. If you then cast Darkvision, you can see the subject. If the subject is invisible, you get the immediate surroundings, but not the subject (until you cast See Invisible). Et cetera. [/QUOTE]

Verification