Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Can sexism be good for plot?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wombat" data-source="post: 1587935" data-attributes="member: 8447"><p>In the world I am currently designing, women developed magical powers; essentially they started as sorcerers. Men far later learned the trick through wizardry, but it is harder to learn (you must begin your character's life as a wizard, due to training restrictions, etc.), while women may be either wizards (with the same restrictions) or sorcerers (may develop at any time). On the other hand, not <em>all </em> women are sorcerers, only a small percentage of the population. </p><p></p><p>Conversely, men control most of the military; much like in our own world, women arediscouraged from the military as they are the main child-rearers -- anatomy and all that. This means that most weapon training and the like is a Men Only club. </p><p></p><p>The learned are split pretty much equally between men and women. Judges, scholars, and the like could as likely be men as women, but they tend to bring their own prejudices with them (as always happens) and there are endless intellectual debates over the relative merits of male versus female.</p><p></p><p>This means that there is a state of semi-equality. Few women are allowed to train with weapons, few men learn magic. Each is powerful in their own regard, but the genders are not precisely equal. Politically there is something of a tug-of-war -- while the society is nominally patriarchal, at least as far as naming practices are concerned, inheritance is left far more open. Some families go strictly primogeniture -- whoever is first born, regardless of sex, gets the whole ball of wax. Others go for first male. Others go for equal shares. </p><p></p><p>Politically the main kingdom follows straight primogeniture for the royal family, but the major noble families choose on their own. </p><p></p><p>In other words, sexism is built into the world, but it is a multi-faceted sexism where both sides can claim superiority in different spheres of influence. Since I have four men and two women in my group, they are now excited about how this will play out -- and they are adding extra background bits to muddle the picture further!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wombat, post: 1587935, member: 8447"] In the world I am currently designing, women developed magical powers; essentially they started as sorcerers. Men far later learned the trick through wizardry, but it is harder to learn (you must begin your character's life as a wizard, due to training restrictions, etc.), while women may be either wizards (with the same restrictions) or sorcerers (may develop at any time). On the other hand, not [I]all [/I] women are sorcerers, only a small percentage of the population. Conversely, men control most of the military; much like in our own world, women arediscouraged from the military as they are the main child-rearers -- anatomy and all that. This means that most weapon training and the like is a Men Only club. The learned are split pretty much equally between men and women. Judges, scholars, and the like could as likely be men as women, but they tend to bring their own prejudices with them (as always happens) and there are endless intellectual debates over the relative merits of male versus female. This means that there is a state of semi-equality. Few women are allowed to train with weapons, few men learn magic. Each is powerful in their own regard, but the genders are not precisely equal. Politically there is something of a tug-of-war -- while the society is nominally patriarchal, at least as far as naming practices are concerned, inheritance is left far more open. Some families go strictly primogeniture -- whoever is first born, regardless of sex, gets the whole ball of wax. Others go for first male. Others go for equal shares. Politically the main kingdom follows straight primogeniture for the royal family, but the major noble families choose on their own. In other words, sexism is built into the world, but it is a multi-faceted sexism where both sides can claim superiority in different spheres of influence. Since I have four men and two women in my group, they are now excited about how this will play out -- and they are adding extra background bits to muddle the picture further! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Can sexism be good for plot?
Top