Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 7580992" data-attributes="member: 6795602">1.&nbsp; No damage mathematically means 0 damage.&nbsp; 2.&nbsp; No potential to ever do damage is a distinct concept from no damage.&nbsp; 3.&nbsp; Obviously if the net did strength mod damage it wouldn't do 0 damage now.&nbsp; So there was no reason to bring that point up in a discussion about whether the net does 0 damage now but not always.I notice you raise a lot of smart sounding points that don't actually deal with the subject at hand. Raising smart sounding points that have nothing to do with the disagreement may work on some people but it doesn't work on me.Sure, typically those reasons aren't statements everyone already agrees with, including those individuals that don't agree with the position you are attempting to use them to support...Okay, then my opinion is that you provided a terrible justification for why that scenario...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FrogReaver, post: 7580992, member: 6795602"] 1. No damage mathematically means 0 damage. 2. No potential to ever do damage is a distinct concept from no damage. 3. Obviously if the net did strength mod damage it wouldn't do 0 damage now. So there was no reason to bring that point up in a discussion about whether the net does 0 damage now but not always. I notice you raise a lot of smart sounding points that don't actually deal with the subject at hand. Raising smart sounding points that have nothing to do with the disagreement may work on some people but it doesn't work on me. Sure, typically those reasons aren't statements everyone already agrees with, including those individuals that don't agree with the position you are attempting to use them to support... Okay, then my opinion is that you provided a terrible justification for why that scenario... [/QUOTE]

Verification