Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Can somebody explain the bias against game balance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 5139149" data-attributes="member: 19675"><p>Besides the Core 3, I'm now the owner of the Player's Guide to Eberron and</p><p>Forgotten Realms, and plan to get the Dark Sun version when it becomes available.</p><p></p><p>And, to my eye, these books propigate same types of problems inherent in the initial release. The massive, brutish races are still just +2Str, for instance, and the Goliath, for one, lost a very iconic and flavorful ability- Powerful Build.</p><p></p><p>Borrowing a page from Humans, why not just have races like Goliaths, Minotaurs, etc.- the BIG, hulking brutes- have a +4Str and no other stat mod?</p><p></p><p>I also mentioned before that unusual stat mods- including negatives- would be very appropriate for certain species, especially those with traditionally unusual racial attributes that lie outside the norm for most PCs. Someone responded that negative mods would be horrible because that would mean that a race would be worse at...well, whatever that stat modifies. That would penalize players for wanting to play a PC of a certain race and class combo.</p><p></p><p>The response would be that the problem isn't the stat mods, but the class rules. A fighter fights- that is his reason for existing. But there is more to fighting than brute force. Strength helps, to be sure, but there should also be viable builds for Dex based warriors. There is no reason for a Goliath to fights the same way as a Halfling. A Halfling should be able to use his superior Dex to be a hard target and an effective ranged combatant...and be just as effective as the lumbering Goliath.</p><p></p><p>In addition, as has been pointed out by 4Ed proponents, the way 4Ed gets around oddball "legacy" builds from previous editions is to find the class with the desired abilities and call the PC whatever you want. The same goes for oddball builds <em>within 4ED itself.</em> IOW, there is nothing stopping the player from taking a PC with a race with a unusually high Dex mod balanced with a negative Str mod (if one existed) and playing some kind of Dex-based Striker and<em> calling</em> him a Fighter. </p><p></p><p>Or, quite simply, that same PC could, with the DM's permission, be allowed to use Dex as the defining characteristic for his Fighter powers instead of Str.</p><p></p><p></p><p>To sum up, there's more than one way to achieve balance with race designs while retaining the iconic capabilities of legacy races...and it doesn't seem to me as if the WotC designers have sussed that out yet.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed, 100%.</p><p></p><p>And on the flipside, a game virtually devoid of balance may have lots of flavor, but may be unmanageable for the DM...or even other players.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannyalcatraz, post: 5139149, member: 19675"] Besides the Core 3, I'm now the owner of the Player's Guide to Eberron and Forgotten Realms, and plan to get the Dark Sun version when it becomes available. And, to my eye, these books propigate same types of problems inherent in the initial release. The massive, brutish races are still just +2Str, for instance, and the Goliath, for one, lost a very iconic and flavorful ability- Powerful Build. Borrowing a page from Humans, why not just have races like Goliaths, Minotaurs, etc.- the BIG, hulking brutes- have a +4Str and no other stat mod? I also mentioned before that unusual stat mods- including negatives- would be very appropriate for certain species, especially those with traditionally unusual racial attributes that lie outside the norm for most PCs. Someone responded that negative mods would be horrible because that would mean that a race would be worse at...well, whatever that stat modifies. That would penalize players for wanting to play a PC of a certain race and class combo. The response would be that the problem isn't the stat mods, but the class rules. A fighter fights- that is his reason for existing. But there is more to fighting than brute force. Strength helps, to be sure, but there should also be viable builds for Dex based warriors. There is no reason for a Goliath to fights the same way as a Halfling. A Halfling should be able to use his superior Dex to be a hard target and an effective ranged combatant...and be just as effective as the lumbering Goliath. In addition, as has been pointed out by 4Ed proponents, the way 4Ed gets around oddball "legacy" builds from previous editions is to find the class with the desired abilities and call the PC whatever you want. The same goes for oddball builds [I]within 4ED itself.[/I] IOW, there is nothing stopping the player from taking a PC with a race with a unusually high Dex mod balanced with a negative Str mod (if one existed) and playing some kind of Dex-based Striker and[I] calling[/I] him a Fighter. Or, quite simply, that same PC could, with the DM's permission, be allowed to use Dex as the defining characteristic for his Fighter powers instead of Str. To sum up, there's more than one way to achieve balance with race designs while retaining the iconic capabilities of legacy races...and it doesn't seem to me as if the WotC designers have sussed that out yet. Agreed, 100%. And on the flipside, a game virtually devoid of balance may have lots of flavor, but may be unmanageable for the DM...or even other players. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Can somebody explain the bias against game balance?
Top