Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 2810844" data-attributes="member: 957">Maybe there has been no legal double standard.  But there most clearly has been a double standard.First, I believe that the presence of the OGL included in MH would be strong evidence of intent that would impact the way a ruling would go under the exact same laws.  You can site legal references to me all day long.  In the end the real defintion of legal is what the court system hands down in the specific case.  Second, staying to this thread, the tone of discussion has flipped back and forth.  Any time re-wording AM has been the topic it has been described with a tone of matter-of-factness.  Any time re-wording MH has been the topic, the tone has been one of ambiguity and worry.  That is a double standard right there.  To consider that the one that includes a statement of intent to share is the one getting the "worry" filter compounds the degree of double standard.</blockquote>