Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Coredump" data-source="post: 2673314" data-attributes="member: 6939">I wouldn't mind so much, if the FAQ listed when it was making a new ruling, clarifying, offering a house rule, etc. But is so often just 'says stuff', with apparenlty little regard for what the rules already say about it.If the FAQ said "Consider it Errata that you can sheathe as a free action" then I would give it more credit. But id can't even stay consistent *internally*, and it rarely says when it is making new rules, so it has no credibility.Star Wars (jedi Counseling) is awesome in this regard, when they answer questions, it is obvious when they are clarifying rules, making changes in the rules, and just offering optional/house rules.Now, I am not sure if I trust the FAQ writer as much as I do the JC writer...Question: Were *ALL* of the changes in the 3.0 FAQ incorporated into 3.5??</blockquote>