Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Anubis" data-source="post: 2685834" data-attributes="member: 2358">How can anything else matter?&nbsp; It's their intellectual property, so they deem when and where changes are made.&nbsp; WotC says the FAQ is an official source of errata, so it is.&nbsp; They do not say EN World is an official source of errata, so it isn't.&nbsp; Can't get more clear than that.I don't always agree with the rules myself.&nbsp; I've got a crapload of house rules.&nbsp; At least I admit my house rules are house rules, though.&nbsp; If people ask a question about the official rules, I give them the official answer (assuming one exists).&nbsp; If a new issue is brought up, I can give my thoughts on it, but until WotC verifies something I say, it means nothing because I'm not a source of errata.&nbsp; I can give logical opinions on matters WotC has not addressed, but I can't give the official word.The thing is, WotC has given official word here, so the subject should be moot.&nbsp; I'd say Andy Collins is the ultimate primary source in any of these cases since he's the designated go-to man for rules questions, changes, and clarifications.&nbsp; How do we know this?&nbsp; They officially endorce everything he says on it, that's how.Furthermore, when and if this changes, then I would accept that as well.&nbsp; As of right now, though, the FAQ is errata until WotC says otherwise, because they have called it such.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Anubis, post: 2685834, member: 2358"] How can anything else matter? It's their intellectual property, so they deem when and where changes are made. WotC says the FAQ is an official source of errata, so it is. They do not say EN World is an official source of errata, so it isn't. Can't get more clear than that. I don't always agree with the rules myself. I've got a crapload of house rules. At least I admit my house rules are house rules, though. If people ask a question about the official rules, I give them the official answer (assuming one exists). If a new issue is brought up, I can give my thoughts on it, but until WotC verifies something I say, it means nothing because I'm not a source of errata. I can give logical opinions on matters WotC has not addressed, but I can't give the official word. The thing is, WotC [i]has[/i] given official word here, so the subject should be moot. I'd say Andy Collins is the ultimate primary source in any of these cases since he's the designated go-to man for rules questions, changes, and clarifications. How do we know this? They officially endorce everything he says on it, that's how. Furthermore, when and if this changes, then I would accept that as well. As of right now, though, the FAQ is errata until WotC says otherwise, because they have called it such. [/QUOTE]

Verification