Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Coredump" data-source="post: 2687615" data-attributes="member: 6939">One said the FAQ was a source for errata, which I will agree is equivalent.Being an official FAQ, is not the same as being official errata. Yes, he said the FAQ is official, that is very different from saying it is equivalent to errata.So, as I said. One.Plus, you keep saying *WoTC* said something. No, one (and you argue two) CustServ people said something.Just the other day I had a Bank Manager tell me their company policy, and he was darn sure of it. But he was wrong. Now, if WoTC wanted to say it, they could easily post it, or, heaven's forbid, simply change the wording in the FAQ or errata to reflect this. But they haven't.Trevor's answer was not vague. In fact, he was the only one to actually give a complete answer, more than a single sentence. The *only* way to think it was vague, is to somehow believe that he made all that reply, and somehow never mentioned that WoTC *did* use it for errata, eventhough they shouldn't. And does anyone actually believe that Trevor would be 'badmouthing' WoTC's behavior in that way? &quot;Yes they 'should' be different... eventhough I know they are not.&quot; Isn't that a recipe for getting fired?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Coredump, post: 2687615, member: 6939"] One said the FAQ was a source for errata, which I will agree is equivalent. Being an official FAQ, is not the same as being official errata. Yes, he said the FAQ is official, that is very different from saying it is equivalent to errata. So, as I said. One. Plus, you keep saying *WoTC* said something. No, one (and you argue two) CustServ people said something. Just the other day I had a Bank Manager tell me their company policy, and he was darn sure of it. But he was wrong. Now, if WoTC wanted to say it, they could easily post it, or, heaven's forbid, simply change the wording in the FAQ or errata to reflect this. But they haven't. Trevor's answer was not vague. In fact, he was the only one to actually give a complete answer, more than a single sentence. The *only* way to think it was vague, is to somehow believe that he made all that reply, and somehow never mentioned that WoTC *did* use it for errata, eventhough they shouldn't. And does anyone actually believe that Trevor would be 'badmouthing' WoTC's behavior in that way? "Yes they 'should' be different... eventhough I know they are not." Isn't that a recipe for getting fired? [/QUOTE]

Verification