Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Artoomis" data-source="post: 2694990" data-attributes="member: 111">I just sent the following in to WotC:Three things:1.&nbsp; Please fix D&amp;D 3.5 FAQ entries on acid/sonic damage and hardness - one answer says ignore hardness, one says the opposite.2.&nbsp; Please fix the D&amp;D 3.5 FAQ entry on two-handed weapon (it includes a discussion on the lance used one-handed).&nbsp; The answer was written in such a way as to really mess up the weapon rules realted to (at least) hardness and hit points.&nbsp; Does a lance REALLY have fewer hit point when used one-handed?&nbsp; The FAQ entry would make this so, but clearly that was not the intent.3.&nbsp; Please change the primary source rule so that it states that primary sources are the core rule, errata AND the FAQ.See <a href="http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=153552" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=153552</a> for why I am asking for the FAQ to be declared as a primary rule source.&nbsp; Note that this WILL require that FAQ entries make it very clear when thw answer is only a &quot;best advice&quot; kind of answer - which are ALSO appropriate in the FAQ.Thanks.Reference Number 051102-000118, if anyone cares.The answers to this should be very revealing as to WotC's direction with the FAQ.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Artoomis, post: 2694990, member: 111"] I just sent the following in to WotC: Three things: 1. Please fix D&D 3.5 FAQ entries on acid/sonic damage and hardness - one answer says ignore hardness, one says the opposite. 2. Please fix the D&D 3.5 FAQ entry on two-handed weapon (it includes a discussion on the lance used one-handed). The answer was written in such a way as to really mess up the weapon rules realted to (at least) hardness and hit points. Does a lance REALLY have fewer hit point when used one-handed? The FAQ entry would make this so, but clearly that was not the intent. 3. Please change the primary source rule so that it states that primary sources are the core rule, errata AND the FAQ. See [url]http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=153552[/url] for why I am asking for the FAQ to be declared as a primary rule source. Note that this WILL require that FAQ entries make it very clear when thw answer is only a "best advice" kind of answer - which are ALSO appropriate in the FAQ. Thanks. Reference Number 051102-000118, if anyone cares. The answers to this should be very revealing as to WotC's direction with the FAQ. [/QUOTE]

Verification