Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="irdeggman" data-source="post: 2695350" data-attributes="member: 16285">I have to disagree.&nbsp; I think this is dependant on how you are reading the FAQ.What was the question that the Sage was answering?&nbsp; That gives the context of the answer. He didn't stray from this when I read his response. The main question was pertaining to benefits via use (either one-handed or two-handed) and not construction or material type benefits.To sum up (and abreviate the question) this is what I get as the question being answered.Note the emphasis on benefits. Benefits have nothing to do with equipment properties, like hardness or hit points. Remember these are also modified by other properties like material of construction which are likewise not addressed by the Sage's answer.IMO an experience it extremely important to get the context of the discussion down in order to read and understand what is being said in the manner it was intended.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="irdeggman, post: 2695350, member: 16285"] I have to disagree. I think this is dependant on how you are reading the FAQ. What was the question that the Sage was answering? That gives the context of the answer. He didn't stray from this when I read his response. The main question was pertaining to benefits via use (either one-handed or two-handed) and not construction or material type benefits. To sum up (and abreviate the question) this is what I get as the question being answered. Note the emphasis on benefits. Benefits have nothing to do with equipment properties, like hardness or hit points. Remember these are also modified by other properties like material of construction which are likewise not addressed by the Sage's answer. IMO an experience it extremely important to get the context of the discussion down in order to read and understand what is being said in the manner it was intended. [/QUOTE]

Verification