Can we have (-) only threads now?

[trappedslider]

I'm cur5ious if we can now have - along with + in the general geek media area.

 

[Reynard]

Aren't all not + threads ultimately - threads after page 3?

 

[BookTenTiger]

I'm cur5ious if we can now have - along with + in the general geek media area.

What would you get out of a - thread that you can't get in a normal one?

I believe + threads mean "the premise of this topic is not up for debate," not necessarily "stay positive."

What would a - thread even mean?

 

[Reynard]

What would you get out of a - thread that you can't get in a normal one?

I believe + threads mean "the premise of this topic is not up for debate," not necessarily "stay positive."

What would a - thread even mean?

Maybe it would be the thread version of

 

[Sacrosanct]

What would you get out of a - thread that you can't get in a normal one?

I believe + threads mean "the premise of this topic is not up for debate," not necessarily "stay positive."

What would a - thread even mean?

Yeah, that's my question too. + threads are "let's talk about 4e, but only things you like about it." That has value, because fans can talk without people coming in to pee in their cheerios. Would a - thread be "let's talk about 4e, but only comments about how much you hate it are allowed."

I'm...dubious on how well or constructive that thread would progress.

 

[gnarlygninja]

Yeah, that's my question too. + threads are "let's talk about 4e, but only things you like about it." That has value, because fans can talk without people coming in to pee in their cheerios. Would a - thread be "let's talk about 4e, but only comments about how much you hate it are allowed."

I'm...dubious on how well or constructive that thread would progress.

Since I'm pretty sure I know what topic this is in response to, it would be "let's talk about this thing, but you're only allowed to post articles/videos about how it's bad."

 

[Morrus]

Sure. But the starter of any [-] thread has to pay the moderators $10 per post report to keep the peace.

At least I’ll be able to retire early.

 

[trappedslider]

Sure. But the starter of any [-] thread has to pay the moderators $10 per post report to keep the peace.

At least I’ll be able to retire early.

well there's a thread in which the op has made it clear that views that don't align with his opening post that being the negative aspect of something is not welcomed.

 

[Morrus]

well there's a thread in which the op has made it clear that views that don't align with his opening post that being the negative aspect of something is not welcomed.

I didn't understand a word of that. Sorry.

 

[Micah Sweet]

I believe + threads mean "the premise of this topic is not up for debate," not necessarily "stay positive."

I don't think that was the intention, but practically speaking that's what folks seem to mean.

"Don't disagree with this post".