Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can you CHOOSE to turn your spell into a full-round action?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CRGreathouse" data-source="post: 147711" data-attributes="member: 474"><p>First, I'll break your argument down into:</p><p></p><p>1. Standard action = MEA + partial action</p><p>2. Standard action = MEA + MEA</p><p>Therefore,</p><p>3. MEA + partial action = MEA + MEA</p><p>4. Partial action = MEA</p><p></p><p>#1 is wrong for two reasons. First, the normal action one takes (e.g. atacking) is not a partial action, though a partial action could be used to make that same action in most cases. (This is a nitpicking point, but had to be made by someone.) Second, equality works both ways - and this doesn't. A character can't choose to recombine a partial action and a MEA to make a standard action (if <em>hasted</em> and the standard action has already been taken, less the move, for example).</p><p></p><p>#2 is incorrect for the same reason: equality is a bidirectional operator. The rules do not allow characters to substitute two MEAs for a standard action.</p><p></p><p>#3 is a falacy, as its premeses are flawed.</p><p></p><p>#4 is also a falacy, as its premese is flawed.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Here are the correct relationships:</p><p></p><p>Standard action -> MEA + MEA</p><p>Partial action -> MEA</p><p>and in a loose sense:</p><p>Standard action -> partial action + MEA</p><p></p><p>All of these operators are unidirectional.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CRGreathouse, post: 147711, member: 474"] First, I'll break your argument down into: 1. Standard action = MEA + partial action 2. Standard action = MEA + MEA Therefore, 3. MEA + partial action = MEA + MEA 4. Partial action = MEA #1 is wrong for two reasons. First, the normal action one takes (e.g. atacking) is not a partial action, though a partial action could be used to make that same action in most cases. (This is a nitpicking point, but had to be made by someone.) Second, equality works both ways - and this doesn't. A character can't choose to recombine a partial action and a MEA to make a standard action (if [i]hasted[/i] and the standard action has already been taken, less the move, for example). #2 is incorrect for the same reason: equality is a bidirectional operator. The rules do not allow characters to substitute two MEAs for a standard action. #3 is a falacy, as its premeses are flawed. #4 is also a falacy, as its premese is flawed. Here are the correct relationships: Standard action -> MEA + MEA Partial action -> MEA and in a loose sense: Standard action -> partial action + MEA All of these operators are unidirectional. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can you CHOOSE to turn your spell into a full-round action?
Top