Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magus_Jerel" data-source="post: 147843" data-attributes="member: 3940">And this is why I must reduce it all to a function of time - nothing more or less.  If I cannot do so - then it falls apart - but all the actions take "time".This - makes it a question of the first order.  I don't dare try to put "all possible actions" into a single rubric in and of itself; but I DO dare to quantify them relative to one another in an objective fashion using logic of this power.Bold? - yeahRevolutionary - Maybe...but it's not like I am trying to derive modus tollens for the first time either, or prove the foundation of symbolic logic.I am reading their intent very carefully - applying the principles of textualism and presuming that they were not anticipating the application of logical forms to their words.Evidently - people are really hating the very idea of being able to take two partial actions as you will in one round without invoking magic.  This is like - absolutely verboten here.That is - largely, the only true consequence of this whole thing.The second question of "what you can and can't do on your turn" also gets a swift realigning - one that is also very playable as far as I can tell.  None of my players have complained about this interpretation or system being used - at any level of the game.Granted, it threw their heads for a loop when trying to get used to it - but it worked after a couple of sessions quite nicely.</blockquote>