Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Sigil" data-source="post: 148601" data-attributes="member: 2013">Wrong again...Except this, too, is a flawed statement in that once again you are comparing the Specific Case of Double Move to the General Case of Standard Action.It seems clear to me that the qualifier ought instead to be Double Move Action &lt;- Standard Action with respect to how long each takes in the D&amp;D round.&nbsp; You cannot disprove that statement using the rules as written and logic, no matter how you try.&nbsp; Again, use MEA = 2.5 sec and PA = 3.5 sec and you get a theory that is completely in harmony with the rules as written and as understood by everyone except yourself... and the 2 PAs in one round are disallowed, *per the rules.*I also love the way you are trying now to hop back and forth between &quot;first order logic&quot; and &quot;temporal arguments.&quot;&nbsp; If you are so convinced of your iron-clad logic, you need no temporal arguments.&nbsp; That you are trying to bring them in now only shows the weakness of your position.--The Sigil</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Sigil, post: 148601, member: 2013"] [b]Wrong again...[/b] Except this, too, is a flawed statement in that once again you are comparing the Specific Case of Double Move to the General Case of Standard Action. It seems clear to me that the qualifier ought instead to be Double Move Action <- Standard Action with respect to how long each takes in the D&D round. You cannot disprove that statement using the rules as written and logic, no matter how you try. Again, use MEA = 2.5 sec and PA = 3.5 sec and you get a theory that is completely in harmony with the rules as written and as understood by everyone except yourself... and the 2 PAs in one round are disallowed, *per the rules.* I also love the way you are trying now to hop back and forth between "first order logic" and "temporal arguments." If you are so convinced of your iron-clad logic, you need no temporal arguments. That you are trying to bring them in now only shows the weakness of your position. --The Sigil [/QUOTE]

Verification