NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magus_Jerel" data-source="post: 152950" data-attributes="member: 3940">oh boy...Caliban:WRONGbenefit of haste under current system = 2 spells + move action + quicken spell instead of 1 spell + movebenefit of "change" = 2 spells instead of 1 spell + moveWRONG:You forget that the "third" spell is at the expense of a move actionThe mage with haste gets a lone option -cast a spell or take a move actionso this:Is false.Please take the time to consider and fully comprehend the implications of the acutal "change" in the rules before you attempt to criticize it.  (I still state that it isn't a change... but lets not go there)To do otherwise is only to demonstrate a distinct lack of ability to comprehend the implications either a change in perception or a change of rules.  Granted, you seem to get the implications of the existing rules quite well.  I wouldn't be criiqing "house rules" I were you.Um - at the higher levels of the game, under this system mages can get off four spells - two normal, one from haste, and one quickened.at similar levels, Fighter types get 3 to 4 attacks - WITHOUT resorting to feats, magic - ect, and they have a whole bunch of them to use by now.Also - fighters never run out of attacks.  Mages DO run out of spells...At the highest level of the game - the wizzie can actually run off up to 20 nifty spells under this system - given one lucky die roll of 4 on a d4 after casting the right spellat the highest levels of the existing system given the same nifty die roll - that count is only 15... oh poo...15 fireballs coming frim the mage...20 fireballs coming from the mage... same end effect preety much - toasted opponents.Cl1mh4224rd:If by increasing the "power level" you mean increasing the lethality... gee... wouldn't this be a positive thing?  It would encourage players from resorting to violence to solve all problems because *gasp* they might lose their character.  Oh, I forgot - D&D players WANT to play out the "dumb" method of resorting solving all problems by resorting to violence...The humor bit:StudentGivens1 .Girls = money + time 2. Money = time Derivation3. Girls = money + money 4. money is the root of all evil thus 5 .Girls = sqrt(money+money) 6. Girls = evilTeaching Assistantline 4 = syntax errorline 5 = invalid line due to error of 4line 6 = operational errorGirls = sqrt(2*money) not Girls = sqrt(money^2)Professor25% of derivation test correct.you flunked the test, <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Again - the one honest critic I have here admits the logic is flawless given the premeses, and I have answered the idea of less that full use of "potentia" before wit the fact that a "round" is a "round" regardless of wether or not you choose to use the full "capacities" of that round.</blockquote>

Verification