Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you Cleave after a Cup De' Grassey?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 1244599" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>With regard to why sneak attack is allowed, it seems that the designers were considering more the intent of sneak attack and coup de grace. Both have the intent of doing a precise blow that does serious damage.</p><p></p><p>Power Attack, on the other hand, has the intent of doing an imprecise blow that may do serious damage, but at the risk of not hitting at all.</p><p></p><p>So, sneak attack and coup de grace are compatible from a logistics point of view whereas power attack has the opposing logistics point of view.</p><p></p><p>But to say that it is inequitable for sneak attack damage to add in and power attack damage to not add in assumes that those damages are comparable in usage and in the ability to acquire them.</p><p></p><p>Any character with a STR of 13 can acquire Power Attack, but you have to be a dedicated Rogue to acquire any serious levels of Sneak Attack. Plus, Power Attack can be used nearly every single round in combat whereas Sneak Attack is extremely limited in it's combat use. If you think about it, if there is an inequity here, it is that Sneak Attack cannot be used as often as Power Attack and giving Sneak Attack a combat usage that Power Attack does not have is totally equitable.</p><p></p><p>I do not find the concept of allowing one and not the other inequitable at all considering that one is an easy feat to acquire which can be used all of the time in combat and the other is a difficult class skill to acquire which can only be used infrequently in combat (plus the concept that one matches the concept of CDG and the other does not).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 1244599, member: 2011"] With regard to why sneak attack is allowed, it seems that the designers were considering more the intent of sneak attack and coup de grace. Both have the intent of doing a precise blow that does serious damage. Power Attack, on the other hand, has the intent of doing an imprecise blow that may do serious damage, but at the risk of not hitting at all. So, sneak attack and coup de grace are compatible from a logistics point of view whereas power attack has the opposing logistics point of view. But to say that it is inequitable for sneak attack damage to add in and power attack damage to not add in assumes that those damages are comparable in usage and in the ability to acquire them. Any character with a STR of 13 can acquire Power Attack, but you have to be a dedicated Rogue to acquire any serious levels of Sneak Attack. Plus, Power Attack can be used nearly every single round in combat whereas Sneak Attack is extremely limited in it's combat use. If you think about it, if there is an inequity here, it is that Sneak Attack cannot be used as often as Power Attack and giving Sneak Attack a combat usage that Power Attack does not have is totally equitable. I do not find the concept of allowing one and not the other inequitable at all considering that one is an easy feat to acquire which can be used all of the time in combat and the other is a difficult class skill to acquire which can only be used infrequently in combat (plus the concept that one matches the concept of CDG and the other does not). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you Cleave after a Cup De' Grassey?
Top