Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Forrester" data-source="post: 264280" data-attributes="member: 1279">Well, only if they cleave into someone who is also provoking an AoO. I mean, c'mon! You've read the above posts. You'd have to be either a brain-dead troglodyte or a troll lacking any sense of self-respect whatsoever (kreynolds begins humming to himself innocently in the distance) to allow otherwise!<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Be honest. As has been shown, By The Rules, it would be a good tactic for a cleric to summon a dire rat (or whatever) and order it to charge *PAST* your Big Dumb Cleaving Fighter (BDCF) in order for BDCF to get an AoO on it so he could get a free attack into some big beastie. Better yet, summon d4+1 of them -- if the fighter has Combat Reflexes and Great Cleave, he can get d4+1 extra attacks on the big beastie per round! This, to be blunt, is retarded rules manipulation of the most disgusting order, and the reason it doesn't make sense is that the Big Beastie did nothing to provoke an attack. Can we agree about that?</blockquote>