Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you critique these affiliation rules?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oryan77" data-source="post: 4106364" data-attributes="member: 18701"><p>I run a 3.5 Planescape game and I found some affiliation rules (PHB 2) that someone here made for the PS factions. I'm sorry but it's been so long I can't remember who originally made them & give you credit! </p><p></p><p>I decided to use them but I needed to tweak them up to fit our game. I am <strong>not</strong> a rules guy or a game creator, so what I wrote up might be a complete mess. I'm wondering if anyone would help me out and critique them? Let me know what works & doesn't work and give suggestions on how to fix it. My players aren't much help because they only criticize the parts that give them penalties or might be hard to accomplish and yet they never seem to find anything wrong with bonuses that might actually be too powerful.</p><p></p><p>This first affiliation is for the Transcendent Order faction. Their belief is that you 'act without thinking'. They try to make the mind & body one and they train their bodies to perform actions without needing to give it any thought. So I tried to make criterion that reflected this belief. If you have ideas for better criterion, let me know <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>Keep in mind, players aren't expected to raise in rank in these affiliations. They are purely available for people who want to take the belief of their character seriously and raise in ranks. So a powergamer might be hesitant to spread skill points thin just to raise a rank, but a roleplayer might think spending a point in a cross-class skill might be worth it if he raises rank in his faction. I just want to make sure I'm not <strong>totally</strong> screwing the roleplayer over.</p><p></p><p>Please let me know what you think. If I get a lot of help, I might post more of my affiliations up for critiques <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/nervous.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":heh:" title="Nervous Laugh :heh:" data-shortname=":heh:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oryan77, post: 4106364, member: 18701"] I run a 3.5 Planescape game and I found some affiliation rules (PHB 2) that someone here made for the PS factions. I'm sorry but it's been so long I can't remember who originally made them & give you credit! I decided to use them but I needed to tweak them up to fit our game. I am [b]not[/b] a rules guy or a game creator, so what I wrote up might be a complete mess. I'm wondering if anyone would help me out and critique them? Let me know what works & doesn't work and give suggestions on how to fix it. My players aren't much help because they only criticize the parts that give them penalties or might be hard to accomplish and yet they never seem to find anything wrong with bonuses that might actually be too powerful. This first affiliation is for the Transcendent Order faction. Their belief is that you 'act without thinking'. They try to make the mind & body one and they train their bodies to perform actions without needing to give it any thought. So I tried to make criterion that reflected this belief. If you have ideas for better criterion, let me know :) Keep in mind, players aren't expected to raise in rank in these affiliations. They are purely available for people who want to take the belief of their character seriously and raise in ranks. So a powergamer might be hesitant to spread skill points thin just to raise a rank, but a roleplayer might think spending a point in a cross-class skill might be worth it if he raises rank in his faction. I just want to make sure I'm not [b]totally[/b] screwing the roleplayer over. Please let me know what you think. If I get a lot of help, I might post more of my affiliations up for critiques :heh: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you critique these affiliation rules?
Top