Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you do a "diamond" shaped blast?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dracorat" data-source="post: 4319874" data-attributes="member: 40170"><p>Let me be absolutely clear here. I am not trying to get other people to adopt this interpretation if they don't want to, but I am pointing out that it is valid within the rules as they are written.</p><p></p><p>If you interpret their <em>intent</em> differently, then I will be perfectly at peace with you deciding to run games that way. But the original question of "is this allowed in the rules" I state that the diagram I drew up a couple pages back would be.</p><p></p><p>It may be <em>uncomfortable</em> to think that by using diagonals, more internal squares are affected, but the count of internal squares is not part of the rule for blasts. (It is for bursts because of their different method of measurement). </p><p></p><p>For reasons such as this, I have given my groups the option of sticking with 3.5 measurements for things. One group chose to, one group chose not to.</p><p></p><p>And in neither are issues like this really a problem. In truth, the "danger" of including additional squares never really feels "unfair" to the players, even when monsters use it.</p><p></p><p>And until this thread, I was always under the assumption when people measured three squares on a side, they did it in any orientation they wished.</p><p></p><p>I am not here to say "I am right, you are wrong" but rather to say to the OP that using RAW, there are people (like me) who do believe it is perfectly legitimate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dracorat, post: 4319874, member: 40170"] Let me be absolutely clear here. I am not trying to get other people to adopt this interpretation if they don't want to, but I am pointing out that it is valid within the rules as they are written. If you interpret their [i]intent[/i] differently, then I will be perfectly at peace with you deciding to run games that way. But the original question of "is this allowed in the rules" I state that the diagram I drew up a couple pages back would be. It may be [i]uncomfortable[/i] to think that by using diagonals, more internal squares are affected, but the count of internal squares is not part of the rule for blasts. (It is for bursts because of their different method of measurement). For reasons such as this, I have given my groups the option of sticking with 3.5 measurements for things. One group chose to, one group chose not to. And in neither are issues like this really a problem. In truth, the "danger" of including additional squares never really feels "unfair" to the players, even when monsters use it. And until this thread, I was always under the assumption when people measured three squares on a side, they did it in any orientation they wished. I am not here to say "I am right, you are wrong" but rather to say to the OP that using RAW, there are people (like me) who do believe it is perfectly legitimate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you do a "diamond" shaped blast?
Top