Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you do a "diamond" shaped blast?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xanaqui" data-source="post: 4321504" data-attributes="member: 56394"><p><strong>This is why Pi = 2 is not a good idea</strong></p><p></p><p>The easiest solution is to house-rule diagonals back as they are in 3.x. Otherwise, you're stuck in a geometry that has a Pi of 2, where circles are squares, and any accurate visualization of even this trivial of a problem requires double the number of dimensions one would expect (4 in this case).</p><p></p><p>Using a crude method of estimation, I think that a diagonal "square" that's length roughly 2.12 (=3/sqrt(2)) on the right side (why? Because in that direction, sqrt(2) = 1 in the other direction. really - you need to look at this problem in 4 dimensions. Make a bunch of circles in paper, and tape them together so that each circle touches 8 others, and has no empty space between circles, and you'll quickly see what I mean as you'll run out of 3-space very quickly) would get you close to the same area as the one on the left side.</p><p></p><p>Of course, this is sort of a meaningless exercise - why? because the square you show on the left side of your example is, in fact, diagonal. Even worse, if you rotate it any number of degrees, you get exactly the same shape as the one on the left side; the one on the right is no form of rotation, of the one on the left. That's because a square is a circle. From a geometric standpoint, what you're trying to do on the right side is the same as offsetting a area effect in 3.x so that it hits different partial squares. As such, only portions of some squares are hit.</p><p></p><p>So if I were to allow offsets, I'd permit a diagonal of 2 (why? because 2 is a simpler number than 2.12), which would likely mean that 2 orcs is are fully hit, and 2 orcs are hit in half their space (perhaps give them +2 to defense and evasion?).</p><p></p><p>Now, obviously I'm ignoring RAW above. If you do permit the shape on the right, I'd consider virtually always using it - it simply hits more area. If you want an argument to disallow it, note that the shape on the right is not a square.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xanaqui, post: 4321504, member: 56394"] [b]This is why Pi = 2 is not a good idea[/b] The easiest solution is to house-rule diagonals back as they are in 3.x. Otherwise, you're stuck in a geometry that has a Pi of 2, where circles are squares, and any accurate visualization of even this trivial of a problem requires double the number of dimensions one would expect (4 in this case). Using a crude method of estimation, I think that a diagonal "square" that's length roughly 2.12 (=3/sqrt(2)) on the right side (why? Because in that direction, sqrt(2) = 1 in the other direction. really - you need to look at this problem in 4 dimensions. Make a bunch of circles in paper, and tape them together so that each circle touches 8 others, and has no empty space between circles, and you'll quickly see what I mean as you'll run out of 3-space very quickly) would get you close to the same area as the one on the left side. Of course, this is sort of a meaningless exercise - why? because the square you show on the left side of your example is, in fact, diagonal. Even worse, if you rotate it any number of degrees, you get exactly the same shape as the one on the left side; the one on the right is no form of rotation, of the one on the left. That's because a square is a circle. From a geometric standpoint, what you're trying to do on the right side is the same as offsetting a area effect in 3.x so that it hits different partial squares. As such, only portions of some squares are hit. So if I were to allow offsets, I'd permit a diagonal of 2 (why? because 2 is a simpler number than 2.12), which would likely mean that 2 orcs is are fully hit, and 2 orcs are hit in half their space (perhaps give them +2 to defense and evasion?). Now, obviously I'm ignoring RAW above. If you do permit the shape on the right, I'd consider virtually always using it - it simply hits more area. If you want an argument to disallow it, note that the shape on the right is not a square. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you do a "diamond" shaped blast?
Top