Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you help me to determine what alignment is this?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greenfield" data-source="post: 5999192" data-attributes="member: 6669384"><p>Having played a Lawful Evil a few times I can tell you this guy feels very familiar.</p><p></p><p>When I play them, they always respect the system of power, presuming that there is one. They support the system because their own climb to power requires that there be such a system to rule.</p><p></p><p>If there is no system, they'll build one. If the system doesn't provide the leaders with the type or degree of power desired, then and only then will the LE consider fighting the system. Usually they'll try to work their way upwards within it though, modifying it as they progress.</p><p></p><p>This is what I'm seeing in this character. "The System" isn't just his Brotherhood. It's the social order, including the Nobles at the top and the peasants at the bottom. He supports the system, and "loves" the officers (though he doesn't respect them) because they are part of that system that he needs to establish his rule. He needs them. But his goal is to change that system into one that can rule, and into one that can itself be ruled "with an iron fist". He prefers a bloodless path, as in, to work his way up from within, but doesn't really care if the path towards his goal is a bloody one, so long as it gets him there.</p><p></p><p>He "loves" his brothers, but expects from them the same kind of blind loyalty he sees in himself. Ultimately, though, his loyalty is to himself.</p><p></p><p>Daniel Webster once wrote (I may be slightly off on the wording, so forgive me), "In every generation there are those that desire power. Though they promise to be good masters, they promise to be masters. And though they mean to rule wisely, they mean to rule."</p><p></p><p>That's this guy. He feigns support for the poor, the common man, but admits that he really doesn't care for them, other than their valuable place in society: Below him.</p><p></p><p>He feigns support for the officers, but clearly means to promote himself over them.</p><p></p><p>I rate him as LE, with a relatively weak L, purely because of his contempt for the "greasy" nobility, and his desire to essentially eliminate them from the system. If The Brotherhood is to rule all, then there's no room in the chain of command for an hereditary nobility. For his dream to work, they'd need to be eliminated, or neutralized. They wouldn't accept "neutralized" lightly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greenfield, post: 5999192, member: 6669384"] Having played a Lawful Evil a few times I can tell you this guy feels very familiar. When I play them, they always respect the system of power, presuming that there is one. They support the system because their own climb to power requires that there be such a system to rule. If there is no system, they'll build one. If the system doesn't provide the leaders with the type or degree of power desired, then and only then will the LE consider fighting the system. Usually they'll try to work their way upwards within it though, modifying it as they progress. This is what I'm seeing in this character. "The System" isn't just his Brotherhood. It's the social order, including the Nobles at the top and the peasants at the bottom. He supports the system, and "loves" the officers (though he doesn't respect them) because they are part of that system that he needs to establish his rule. He needs them. But his goal is to change that system into one that can rule, and into one that can itself be ruled "with an iron fist". He prefers a bloodless path, as in, to work his way up from within, but doesn't really care if the path towards his goal is a bloody one, so long as it gets him there. He "loves" his brothers, but expects from them the same kind of blind loyalty he sees in himself. Ultimately, though, his loyalty is to himself. Daniel Webster once wrote (I may be slightly off on the wording, so forgive me), "In every generation there are those that desire power. Though they promise to be good masters, they promise to be masters. And though they mean to rule wisely, they mean to rule." That's this guy. He feigns support for the poor, the common man, but admits that he really doesn't care for them, other than their valuable place in society: Below him. He feigns support for the officers, but clearly means to promote himself over them. I rate him as LE, with a relatively weak L, purely because of his contempt for the "greasy" nobility, and his desire to essentially eliminate them from the system. If The Brotherhood is to rule all, then there's no room in the chain of command for an hereditary nobility. For his dream to work, they'd need to be eliminated, or neutralized. They wouldn't accept "neutralized" lightly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you help me to determine what alignment is this?
Top