Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Camarath" data-source="post: 1643639" data-attributes="member: 11987">We shall indeed see what WotC Customer Service has to say about this topic. I will post their responce when I receive it.&nbsp;The Great Cleave feat text states that it works like Cleave the table entry just says there is &quot;No limit to the cleave attacks each round&quot; this could mean either that Great Cleave alters Cleave to remove it's limit or that Great Cleave is a separate ability which grants unlimited cleave attacks IMO the text of the feat (primary source) supports the latter not the former.&nbsp;Then remove the Normal entry if you want. There sacrosanct about my working House Rules and I just put that line in for convenience since the feat directly alters another feat.&nbsp;I am pursuing this line of argument not because I believe anyone should play this way but because it seems to me that the rules as written might actually give you two parallel abilities. If hearing me say &quot;I am wrong and no one should ever play this way&quot; will assuage peoples' psyches I will say that now (although I think I kind of already said this in post #4). I am debating this point because I like to debate about literal meaning of rules. I am not trying to offened or disturb anyone and I am sorry if I have done so. (see disclaimer below)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Camarath, post: 1643639, member: 11987"] We shall indeed see what WotC Customer Service has to say about this topic. I will post their responce when I receive it. The Great Cleave feat text states that it works like Cleave the table entry just says there is "No limit to the cleave attacks each round" this could mean either that Great Cleave alters Cleave to remove it's limit or that Great Cleave is a separate ability which grants unlimited cleave attacks IMO the text of the feat (primary source) supports the latter not the former. Then remove the Normal entry if you want. There sacrosanct about my working House Rules and I just put that line in for convenience since the feat directly alters another feat. I am pursuing this line of argument not because I believe anyone should play this way but because it seems to me that the rules as written might actually give you two parallel abilities. If hearing me say "I am wrong and no one should ever play this way" will assuage peoples' psyches I will say that now (although I think I kind of already said this in post #4). I am debating this point because I like to debate about literal meaning of rules. I am not trying to offened or disturb anyone and I am sorry if I have done so. (see disclaimer below) [/QUOTE]

Verification