Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you Quickdraw in the middle of an Attack?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Camarath" data-source="post: 1657593" data-attributes="member: 11987"><p>You are assuming that the sentence cover all exclusions and limitations it clearly does not as it states that you can have either of the two feats but Cleave is a perquisite for Great Cleave meaning that normally to gain one of the feats one must gain the other. This means the either can not really means either it must normally mean "If you have Cleave or both Cleave and Great Cleave". I attribute the inconstancies of the sentence to the vagaries of its phrasing.</p><p>The sentence does not specify if one has Cleave or both Cleave and Great Cleave so the possibly attacks could be for if one has Great Cleave and it is the first attack (which also is not specified).</p><p> If they wrote the sentence based on the first foe dropped and moving foward why did they make no mention of the foe being dropped being the first foe dropped or of subsequent droppings of other foes. The sentence only talks about dropping one foe and does not say if that foe is the first foe dropped. I think the used to word possibly because two conditions must be met for you to gain two attacks one that you have both Cleave and Great Cleave and two that it is the first foe dropped in a round neither of these conditions are required by the sentence so they may or may not be the case (a possibility).</p><p> Assuming that the sentence assumes (but does not state) that the foe dropped is the first foe dropped in a round to is IMO too much assumption to base a definitive conclussion on. The sentence does not specify if the dropped foe is the first dropped foe of the round and thus does not require it to be. You may think it make sense for it to be so but the sentence does not mandate that it is the first foe dropped. Thus this sentence can mean different things based on the preconceptions you feed into it. It more than likely is meant to mean what you believe it to mean but it does not stated that unambiguously. IMO that means that it can't be used as a definitive proof that cleave works in the way you believe that it is meant to. Once we start adding to the sentence so that it fits our interpretation the sentence losses any ability to differentiate between our two interpretations.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Camarath, post: 1657593, member: 11987"] You are assuming that the sentence cover all exclusions and limitations it clearly does not as it states that you can have either of the two feats but Cleave is a perquisite for Great Cleave meaning that normally to gain one of the feats one must gain the other. This means the either can not really means either it must normally mean "If you have Cleave or both Cleave and Great Cleave". I attribute the inconstancies of the sentence to the vagaries of its phrasing. The sentence does not specify if one has Cleave or both Cleave and Great Cleave so the possibly attacks could be for if one has Great Cleave and it is the first attack (which also is not specified). If they wrote the sentence based on the first foe dropped and moving foward why did they make no mention of the foe being dropped being the first foe dropped or of subsequent droppings of other foes. The sentence only talks about dropping one foe and does not say if that foe is the first foe dropped. I think the used to word possibly because two conditions must be met for you to gain two attacks one that you have both Cleave and Great Cleave and two that it is the first foe dropped in a round neither of these conditions are required by the sentence so they may or may not be the case (a possibility). Assuming that the sentence assumes (but does not state) that the foe dropped is the first foe dropped in a round to is IMO too much assumption to base a definitive conclussion on. The sentence does not specify if the dropped foe is the first dropped foe of the round and thus does not require it to be. You may think it make sense for it to be so but the sentence does not mandate that it is the first foe dropped. Thus this sentence can mean different things based on the preconceptions you feed into it. It more than likely is meant to mean what you believe it to mean but it does not stated that unambiguously. IMO that means that it can't be used as a definitive proof that cleave works in the way you believe that it is meant to. Once we start adding to the sentence so that it fits our interpretation the sentence losses any ability to differentiate between our two interpretations. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you Quickdraw in the middle of an Attack?
Top