Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can you share your experience with a featless/multiclassless game?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 8268860" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>Because of course neither your basic to hit or damage roll is meaningful and neither is your subclass. Seriously it's <em>far </em>from clear that Sharpshooter is superior to +2 Dex for an archer where that's available. More to hit, more damage, better melee, and better defence, and better skills. Depending on your stat spread Piercer is either amazing or utterly useless.</p><p></p><p>Also I call cherry picking if you're going for archery.</p><p></p><p>But even if we assume you are right then <em>so what? </em>What difference does it actually make? If we assume you are right then 100% of archer fighters have the Sharpshooter feat ASAP (they don't) then</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Without feats at level 4 then 100% of archer fighters have the Archery fighting style and +2 Dex</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">With feats at level 4 according to you then 100% of archer fighters have the Archery fighting style and Sharpshooter.</li> </ul><p>How is one of these more varied than the other? Except in that the sharpshooter fighter is more different from other fighters than the dex fighter is.</p><p></p><p>In reality however I'd estimate that with feats at level 4 it's more like the following:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">33% of archer fighters have +2 Dex because they are skirmish fighters and know the enemy will get in their face or want to be more flexible</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">33% of archer fighters have Sharpshooter to focus on long range shooting</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">16% of archer fighters have Piercer because they had an odd Dex and aren't so worried about secondary stats</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">16% of archer fighters chose another feat </li> </ul><p>Even if we assume that by level 8 they will all be Dex 20 + Sharpshooter <em>their path will have been different. </em>This believe it or not actually matters.</p><p></p><p>The second thing worth mentioning here is that without feats pre level 11 archer fighters are chumps. The archer ranger gets the archery fighting style, hunter's mark, favoured foe, generally an extra dice of damage from their subclass, and more from their casting. Each arrow from the archer ranger is going to threaten more damage than the fighter can. Without feats a Dex 16 fighter reaches Dex 20 at level 6 and the Dex ranger reaches Dex 20 at level 8 so there are only two levels in the first 10 where the fighter isn't strictly behind the ranger as an archer. Meanwhile with feats the ranger only reaches Dex 20 Sharpshooter at level 12 so the fighter has combat advantages in the 6-10 range as well as when they get the third arrow at level 11.</p><p></p><p>What did you actually gain? Not all of us take our morals or aesthetics from fictional supervillains. "When everyone is super then no one will be." was the claim of the bad guy. You get to be more effective at what you are supposed to be good at. And you get to play an archer fighter without knowing you've made a chump's choice by not being a ranger.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 8268860, member: 87792"] Because of course neither your basic to hit or damage roll is meaningful and neither is your subclass. Seriously it's [I]far [/I]from clear that Sharpshooter is superior to +2 Dex for an archer where that's available. More to hit, more damage, better melee, and better defence, and better skills. Depending on your stat spread Piercer is either amazing or utterly useless. Also I call cherry picking if you're going for archery. But even if we assume you are right then [I]so what? [/I]What difference does it actually make? If we assume you are right then 100% of archer fighters have the Sharpshooter feat ASAP (they don't) then [LIST] [*]Without feats at level 4 then 100% of archer fighters have the Archery fighting style and +2 Dex [*]With feats at level 4 according to you then 100% of archer fighters have the Archery fighting style and Sharpshooter. [/LIST] How is one of these more varied than the other? Except in that the sharpshooter fighter is more different from other fighters than the dex fighter is. In reality however I'd estimate that with feats at level 4 it's more like the following: [LIST] [*]33% of archer fighters have +2 Dex because they are skirmish fighters and know the enemy will get in their face or want to be more flexible [*]33% of archer fighters have Sharpshooter to focus on long range shooting [*]16% of archer fighters have Piercer because they had an odd Dex and aren't so worried about secondary stats [*]16% of archer fighters chose another feat [/LIST] Even if we assume that by level 8 they will all be Dex 20 + Sharpshooter [I]their path will have been different. [/I]This believe it or not actually matters. The second thing worth mentioning here is that without feats pre level 11 archer fighters are chumps. The archer ranger gets the archery fighting style, hunter's mark, favoured foe, generally an extra dice of damage from their subclass, and more from their casting. Each arrow from the archer ranger is going to threaten more damage than the fighter can. Without feats a Dex 16 fighter reaches Dex 20 at level 6 and the Dex ranger reaches Dex 20 at level 8 so there are only two levels in the first 10 where the fighter isn't strictly behind the ranger as an archer. Meanwhile with feats the ranger only reaches Dex 20 Sharpshooter at level 12 so the fighter has combat advantages in the 6-10 range as well as when they get the third arrow at level 11. What did you actually gain? Not all of us take our morals or aesthetics from fictional supervillains. "When everyone is super then no one will be." was the claim of the bad guy. You get to be more effective at what you are supposed to be good at. And you get to play an archer fighter without knowing you've made a chump's choice by not being a ranger. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can you share your experience with a featless/multiclassless game?
Top