Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
can you take 10 on a hide check?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 3567027" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>Just like I'm trying to hide from two different people? </p><p></p><p>But, really, I have no problems with using the same roll for different people. That I've already said. My problem is that you cannot make the roll beforehand.</p><p></p><p>You are saying that I hide when I move behind the tree, regardless of observer. How do you determine success? How can you determine that I've successfully used the Hide skill? Do I hide every time I move behind a tree? </p><p></p><p>How is that different than sitting at home, making up lies and then using them later? I'm telling exactly the same lie. The listener can obviously oppose, that's fine, but, I'm telling the same lie. So, why can't I just take 20 (or roll until I get a 20) and then use that lie for, well, ever?</p><p></p><p>If I can hide without an opposed roll, then there is no reason why I cannot take 20. There is no failure without an opposed roll, thus, I should be able to take 20. </p><p></p><p>My arguement is that you cannot use the skill without making an opposed roll. Granted, some skills, like Disguise, can be done beforehand. However, disguise is actually a distinct action:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>whereas hide is not a distinct action. You cannot Hide. You can move and try not to be seen, which, if there is no observer, will be automatically successful, but, you cannot just Hide like you can make a disguise.</p><p></p><p>In the ambush scenario, you would get some pretty hefty circumstance bonuses for what you've done, and, if you did it well enough, you could argue total concealment which obviates the need for Hide checks at all.</p><p></p><p>What you cannot do is sit down, roll hide checks until you get one you like, and then not move until someone comes along. Which is effectively what you are arguing. If I set up my ambush with an hour to spare (for example), I roll my Hide check and get a 2. I don't like that, so I move my blind 5 feet to the left and hide again. This time I get a 18. Great. I like that so I don't move. Gimme enough time and I will get a 20.</p><p></p><p>And you cannot take 20 on opposed checks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 3567027, member: 22779"] Just like I'm trying to hide from two different people? But, really, I have no problems with using the same roll for different people. That I've already said. My problem is that you cannot make the roll beforehand. You are saying that I hide when I move behind the tree, regardless of observer. How do you determine success? How can you determine that I've successfully used the Hide skill? Do I hide every time I move behind a tree? How is that different than sitting at home, making up lies and then using them later? I'm telling exactly the same lie. The listener can obviously oppose, that's fine, but, I'm telling the same lie. So, why can't I just take 20 (or roll until I get a 20) and then use that lie for, well, ever? If I can hide without an opposed roll, then there is no reason why I cannot take 20. There is no failure without an opposed roll, thus, I should be able to take 20. My arguement is that you cannot use the skill without making an opposed roll. Granted, some skills, like Disguise, can be done beforehand. However, disguise is actually a distinct action: whereas hide is not a distinct action. You cannot Hide. You can move and try not to be seen, which, if there is no observer, will be automatically successful, but, you cannot just Hide like you can make a disguise. In the ambush scenario, you would get some pretty hefty circumstance bonuses for what you've done, and, if you did it well enough, you could argue total concealment which obviates the need for Hide checks at all. What you cannot do is sit down, roll hide checks until you get one you like, and then not move until someone comes along. Which is effectively what you are arguing. If I set up my ambush with an hour to spare (for example), I roll my Hide check and get a 2. I don't like that, so I move my blind 5 feet to the left and hide again. This time I get a 18. Great. I like that so I don't move. Gimme enough time and I will get a 20. And you cannot take 20 on opposed checks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
can you take 10 on a hide check?
Top