Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you "Take 20" to Hide?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="airwalkrr" data-source="post: 3325473" data-attributes="member: 12460"><p>Why not? There is no penalty for failing a Spot check other than not finding the character, which you did not know beforehand anyway. The same principle applies to searching for traps. I can stand 10 feet back from a door and examine it carefully for two minutes, thus taking 20. If the door is trapped, it is not going to spring on me if I just stand there. Why could I not look around a room carefully for two minutes to see if anything is lurking in the shadows. Of course, a hiding character might realize that someone is trying to take 20 and intervene before the take 20 is complete. It is possible to interpret this as a penalty for failure, in which case the DM might not allow the character to take 20, but instead start rolling. The DM decides the hiding NPC will wait for three rounds before realizing that the character making Spot checks is trying to take 20 (or he might have the character take 1 minute to make a Sense Motive check before realizing this). If the player making Spot checks has not found the hiding NPC by such a point in time, the DM may decide the hiding character takes another action.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, there is a clear penalty for failing a Hide check: being found. In the case of a Spot check, failing does not change the default condition (i.e. that you cannot see the character in the first place). But in the case of a Hide check, failing DOES change the default condition (i.e. that you cannot be seen). Hence, you cannot take 20 on Hide.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="airwalkrr, post: 3325473, member: 12460"] Why not? There is no penalty for failing a Spot check other than not finding the character, which you did not know beforehand anyway. The same principle applies to searching for traps. I can stand 10 feet back from a door and examine it carefully for two minutes, thus taking 20. If the door is trapped, it is not going to spring on me if I just stand there. Why could I not look around a room carefully for two minutes to see if anything is lurking in the shadows. Of course, a hiding character might realize that someone is trying to take 20 and intervene before the take 20 is complete. It is possible to interpret this as a penalty for failure, in which case the DM might not allow the character to take 20, but instead start rolling. The DM decides the hiding NPC will wait for three rounds before realizing that the character making Spot checks is trying to take 20 (or he might have the character take 1 minute to make a Sense Motive check before realizing this). If the player making Spot checks has not found the hiding NPC by such a point in time, the DM may decide the hiding character takes another action. On the other hand, there is a clear penalty for failing a Hide check: being found. In the case of a Spot check, failing does not change the default condition (i.e. that you cannot see the character in the first place). But in the case of a Hide check, failing DOES change the default condition (i.e. that you cannot be seen). Hence, you cannot take 20 on Hide. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you "Take 20" to Hide?
Top