Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you "Take 20" to Hide?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="airwalkrr" data-source="post: 3327453" data-attributes="member: 12460"><p>Sure, you could keep rolling Hide checks until your buddy cannot see you, but in the case you described above, there is no way for your character to know the difference between rolling a 1 and a 20. Consequently, the first time you try to Hide, you suceed regardless of what you roll, so your friend is unable to offer constructive feedback. Hence you can't take 20 in this situation since you simply do not know.</p><p></p><p>The take 20 rules ASSUME you fail multiple times before succeeding, but that doesn't mean you actually do fail multiple times. But the way I interpret take 20, it also means you just keep trying until you succeed, at which point you stop. Why keep trying after that? So if you succeed on your +25 Hide check the first time against someone with Spot +2, you simply discover that taking 20 is unnecessary.</p><p></p><p>Now in the case where you have +10 to Hide and your buddy has +10 to Spot, he is able to offer more constructive feedback. But even then, to accurately simulate taking 20, you would need to Hide 20 times AND he would need to try to take 20 spotting you each time in order to maximize your Hide check. That seems just a little silly so I prefer to rule that you just can't take 20 on Hide.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="airwalkrr, post: 3327453, member: 12460"] Sure, you could keep rolling Hide checks until your buddy cannot see you, but in the case you described above, there is no way for your character to know the difference between rolling a 1 and a 20. Consequently, the first time you try to Hide, you suceed regardless of what you roll, so your friend is unable to offer constructive feedback. Hence you can't take 20 in this situation since you simply do not know. The take 20 rules ASSUME you fail multiple times before succeeding, but that doesn't mean you actually do fail multiple times. But the way I interpret take 20, it also means you just keep trying until you succeed, at which point you stop. Why keep trying after that? So if you succeed on your +25 Hide check the first time against someone with Spot +2, you simply discover that taking 20 is unnecessary. Now in the case where you have +10 to Hide and your buddy has +10 to Spot, he is able to offer more constructive feedback. But even then, to accurately simulate taking 20, you would need to Hide 20 times AND he would need to try to take 20 spotting you each time in order to maximize your Hide check. That seems just a little silly so I prefer to rule that you just can't take 20 on Hide. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you "Take 20" to Hide?
Top