Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you "Take 20" to Hide?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="StreamOfTheSky" data-source="post: 3328408" data-attributes="member: 35909"><p>If I have a +20 skill modifier and attempt to take 20 on a DC 80 task, do I fail every try until the last, in which I succeed?</p><p></p><p>If I decide to take 20 on a skill check when at the time a 1 will suffice, am I forced to not take 20, even if all the conitions are met?</p><p></p><p>What about when the same check result could potentially apply later, with a different opposed modifier? If I have a Use Rope modifier of +11 and my foe i'm tying up has an escape artist modifier of +1, must I take a 1 on the check (the guy tying gets a +10 bonus, remember, for a total of +21)? What if while not being watched later on, he manages to find a greasy puddle to roll around in for a +2 circumstance to escape being bound? Perhaps a mage friend secretly (Silent and Still Spell) greases him, for a full +10 bonus. If my character making the Use Rope check is paranoid of these things and wants to Take 20 just to be safe, isn't that his choice to make? For the example, we'll just say at the time the captured foe is unconcious at -200 non-lethal damage or something, plenty of time to work with! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>This applies to Hide depending on how you answer Hyp's question. I would say if no movement or adjustment has been made since the original Hide check, the Troll would spot against the same check result. Maybe if the hider successfuly spots the Troll coming, he could readjust his postion and make a new check. If the Troll comes in from a direction that gives him a better vantage point or whatever, that should be a circumstance bonus. No new hide is actually being attempted. My opinion, at least.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Fair enough, I'd be willing to compromise on having the spot buddy nearly your match. But why is it so silly to you? If an assassin and a "face" rogue are pulling a job in a lord's mansion, with the face rogue succeeding in posing as a chef, I could easily see this scenario come into play. While supposedly preparing the meal, he helps his assassin friend find the best possible hiding spot from which to pull off the hit, critiquing each attempt. He hides, meal's served, lord is hit with a miniscule blowgun dart that goes completely unnoticed and contains a deadly poison with a delayed effect: only after a few hours in the bloodstream do the first signs emerge. By which time, they're both gone. Heh, my example got a little unnescessarily complicated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="StreamOfTheSky, post: 3328408, member: 35909"] If I have a +20 skill modifier and attempt to take 20 on a DC 80 task, do I fail every try until the last, in which I succeed? If I decide to take 20 on a skill check when at the time a 1 will suffice, am I forced to not take 20, even if all the conitions are met? What about when the same check result could potentially apply later, with a different opposed modifier? If I have a Use Rope modifier of +11 and my foe i'm tying up has an escape artist modifier of +1, must I take a 1 on the check (the guy tying gets a +10 bonus, remember, for a total of +21)? What if while not being watched later on, he manages to find a greasy puddle to roll around in for a +2 circumstance to escape being bound? Perhaps a mage friend secretly (Silent and Still Spell) greases him, for a full +10 bonus. If my character making the Use Rope check is paranoid of these things and wants to Take 20 just to be safe, isn't that his choice to make? For the example, we'll just say at the time the captured foe is unconcious at -200 non-lethal damage or something, plenty of time to work with! :) This applies to Hide depending on how you answer Hyp's question. I would say if no movement or adjustment has been made since the original Hide check, the Troll would spot against the same check result. Maybe if the hider successfuly spots the Troll coming, he could readjust his postion and make a new check. If the Troll comes in from a direction that gives him a better vantage point or whatever, that should be a circumstance bonus. No new hide is actually being attempted. My opinion, at least. Fair enough, I'd be willing to compromise on having the spot buddy nearly your match. But why is it so silly to you? If an assassin and a "face" rogue are pulling a job in a lord's mansion, with the face rogue succeeding in posing as a chef, I could easily see this scenario come into play. While supposedly preparing the meal, he helps his assassin friend find the best possible hiding spot from which to pull off the hit, critiquing each attempt. He hides, meal's served, lord is hit with a miniscule blowgun dart that goes completely unnoticed and contains a deadly poison with a delayed effect: only after a few hours in the bloodstream do the first signs emerge. By which time, they're both gone. Heh, my example got a little unnescessarily complicated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you "Take 20" to Hide?
Top