Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="StreamOfTheSky" data-source="post: 3330969" data-attributes="member: 35909">Agreeing to disagree is probaly the best thing to do.See, I think of this more as an issue for the PC hiders.&nbsp; If a DM wants a monster hidden, he has plenty of ways in which to do so, regardless of the decision on whether taking 20 is ok.&nbsp; And my definition of fun is different from yours, I guess.&nbsp; I seldom waste the time taking 20, but take 10 whenever possible.&nbsp; Contrary to your view that this is for more tactical use than anything, I find it aids in the role playing to reduce randomness at times.&nbsp; And even more so, the extra time saved from all the dice rolling, as opposed to a static mod + 10, is great.&nbsp; If my rogue is searching for traps, does it really aid in the &quot;fun&quot; to have him take the time to roll for each door, checst, etc...; or just give his modifier to the DM, take 10/20, and roleplay according to what that generates?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="StreamOfTheSky, post: 3330969, member: 35909"] Agreeing to disagree is probaly the best thing to do. See, I think of this more as an issue for the PC hiders. If a DM wants a monster hidden, he has plenty of ways in which to do so, regardless of the decision on whether taking 20 is ok. And my definition of fun is different from yours, I guess. I seldom waste the time taking 20, but take 10 whenever possible. Contrary to your view that this is for more tactical use than anything, I find it aids in the role playing to reduce randomness at times. And even more so, the extra time saved from all the dice rolling, as opposed to a static mod + 10, is great. If my rogue is searching for traps, does it really aid in the "fun" to have him take the time to roll for each door, checst, etc...; or just give his modifier to the DM, take 10/20, and roleplay according to what that generates? [/QUOTE]

Verification