Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you "Take 20" to Hide?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hypersmurf" data-source="post: 3331067" data-attributes="member: 1656"><p>I disagree emphatically.</p><p></p><p>That's like saying that in the case of Open Lock, there is a penalty for failure. The penalty is that you do not open the lock. Because there is a penalty for failure, you cannot take 20.</p><p></p><p>In the case of Search, there is a penalty for failure. The penalty is that you do not find a trap. Because there is a penalty for failure, you cannot take 20.</p><p></p><p>I can't agree with that in the case of Hide, Open Lock, or Search.</p><p></p><p>The result of failing an Open Lock check is the same as not attempting an Open Lock check. There is no penalty for failure.</p><p></p><p>The result of failing an Search check is the same as not attempting an Search check. There is no penalty for failure.</p><p></p><p>The result of not attempting a Disable Device check is that the device is not disabled. The result of failing a Disable Device check might be springing a trap and dying horribly. The failure effect is worse than the no-attempt effect; a penalty for failure.</p><p></p><p>The result of not attempting a Craft check is that the item is not constructed. The result of failing a Craft check might be the loss of raw materials. The failure effect is worse than the no-attempt effect; a penalty for failure.</p><p></p><p>The result of not attempting a Hide check is that you are in plain sight. The result of failing a Hide check is that you are in plain sight. The failure effect is no worse than the no-attempt effect; there is no penalty for failure.</p><p></p><p>-Hyp.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hypersmurf, post: 3331067, member: 1656"] I disagree emphatically. That's like saying that in the case of Open Lock, there is a penalty for failure. The penalty is that you do not open the lock. Because there is a penalty for failure, you cannot take 20. In the case of Search, there is a penalty for failure. The penalty is that you do not find a trap. Because there is a penalty for failure, you cannot take 20. I can't agree with that in the case of Hide, Open Lock, or Search. The result of failing an Open Lock check is the same as not attempting an Open Lock check. There is no penalty for failure. The result of failing an Search check is the same as not attempting an Search check. There is no penalty for failure. The result of not attempting a Disable Device check is that the device is not disabled. The result of failing a Disable Device check might be springing a trap and dying horribly. The failure effect is worse than the no-attempt effect; a penalty for failure. The result of not attempting a Craft check is that the item is not constructed. The result of failing a Craft check might be the loss of raw materials. The failure effect is worse than the no-attempt effect; a penalty for failure. The result of not attempting a Hide check is that you are in plain sight. The result of failing a Hide check is that you are in plain sight. The failure effect is no worse than the no-attempt effect; there is no penalty for failure. -Hyp. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you "Take 20" to Hide?
Top