Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you "Take 20" to Hide?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pawsplay" data-source="post: 3333274" data-attributes="member: 15538"><p>No, not at all. In fact, your example to me fits perfectly into my line of thinking. In each case, the last Hide check made prevails. Taking 20 is a special case; you get the benefit of the 20, but you first must take the penalties of failure. Just as the 7, in the second example, persists for later observers, so too would the 20... and the consequences of a failed skill check. Taking 20 is not the same as a naked 20. </p><p></p><p>Now, if the game is using persistent Hide checks, as a GM, I would certainly roll them in secret, along with the Spot checks. They can, if they wish, experiment to determine how will the character is hidden. However, to me this sounds properly like aiding a Hide check, not Spotting an enemy.</p><p></p><p>There are other objections I might raise; is hiding from enemies the same task as hiding from your friend? Is it not within the GM's purview to make you "freshen" your Hide check when the enemies approach, to represent your ability to hide at that time? After all, nothing in the description of hide says one attempt to remain hidden works indefinitely... that would be impossible, since you can already hide from one person and fail to hide from another. Even if you use persistent Hide checks, it's still up to the GM to call when the check is made. Playing hide and seek may not be deemed a legitimate use of the skill.</p><p></p><p>In any case, whether or not you actually care about the failure to hide from your friend Bob, it disqualifies taking 20.</p><p></p><p><em>Taking 20:When you have plenty of time (generally 2 minutes for a skill that can normally be checked in 1 round, one full-round action, or one standard action), you are faced with no threats or distractions, <strong>and the skill being attempted carries no penalties for failure,</strong> you can take 20.</em></p><p></p><p>Obviously, failing to hide means you not hidden. Since failing to hide from Fred the Goblin carries a penalty for failure, it is illegal to take 20 to do so, even if there is no penalty for hiding from Bob.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pawsplay, post: 3333274, member: 15538"] No, not at all. In fact, your example to me fits perfectly into my line of thinking. In each case, the last Hide check made prevails. Taking 20 is a special case; you get the benefit of the 20, but you first must take the penalties of failure. Just as the 7, in the second example, persists for later observers, so too would the 20... and the consequences of a failed skill check. Taking 20 is not the same as a naked 20. Now, if the game is using persistent Hide checks, as a GM, I would certainly roll them in secret, along with the Spot checks. They can, if they wish, experiment to determine how will the character is hidden. However, to me this sounds properly like aiding a Hide check, not Spotting an enemy. There are other objections I might raise; is hiding from enemies the same task as hiding from your friend? Is it not within the GM's purview to make you "freshen" your Hide check when the enemies approach, to represent your ability to hide at that time? After all, nothing in the description of hide says one attempt to remain hidden works indefinitely... that would be impossible, since you can already hide from one person and fail to hide from another. Even if you use persistent Hide checks, it's still up to the GM to call when the check is made. Playing hide and seek may not be deemed a legitimate use of the skill. In any case, whether or not you actually care about the failure to hide from your friend Bob, it disqualifies taking 20. [i]Taking 20:When you have plenty of time (generally 2 minutes for a skill that can normally be checked in 1 round, one full-round action, or one standard action), you are faced with no threats or distractions, [b]and the skill being attempted carries no penalties for failure,[/b] you can take 20.[/i] Obviously, failing to hide means you not hidden. Since failing to hide from Fred the Goblin carries a penalty for failure, it is illegal to take 20 to do so, even if there is no penalty for hiding from Bob. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you "Take 20" to Hide?
Top