Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you "Take 20" to Hide?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hypersmurf" data-source="post: 3333650" data-attributes="member: 1656"><p>THe process is that you fail repeatedly during the time it would take to accomplish the task twenty times, at the end of which your result is calculated as if you had rolled a 20.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How many Hide checks did you make? In this case, one. Making that Hide check is what caused you to become hidden; it is also the Hide check that failed against this opponent.</p><p></p><p>The Hide check you failed is the Hide check that caused you to become hidden.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In which case, how can a Hide check ever fail? It is always successful to a lesser or greater extent; it can be successful to the extent of hiding you from creatures with a Spot result of 5, or to the extent of hiding you from creatures with a Spot result of 55. Since the check is always successful, there can be no penalty for failure.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not 'on the twentieth try', but 'at the end of a period twenty times longer than would be required to execute the skill once', yes.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You don't succeed 'the first time', because Taking 20 takes 20 times as long as normal. The use of the skill is incomplete until that time is up. Anything that happens before that time is 'failing repeatedly'.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm saying that as written, Take 20 means you fail repeatedly until eventually succeeding with a result calculated as though you had rolled a 20... even if you could normally succeed on a roll of 1.</p><p></p><p>-Hyp.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hypersmurf, post: 3333650, member: 1656"] THe process is that you fail repeatedly during the time it would take to accomplish the task twenty times, at the end of which your result is calculated as if you had rolled a 20. How many Hide checks did you make? In this case, one. Making that Hide check is what caused you to become hidden; it is also the Hide check that failed against this opponent. The Hide check you failed is the Hide check that caused you to become hidden. In which case, how can a Hide check ever fail? It is always successful to a lesser or greater extent; it can be successful to the extent of hiding you from creatures with a Spot result of 5, or to the extent of hiding you from creatures with a Spot result of 55. Since the check is always successful, there can be no penalty for failure. Not 'on the twentieth try', but 'at the end of a period twenty times longer than would be required to execute the skill once', yes. You don't succeed 'the first time', because Taking 20 takes 20 times as long as normal. The use of the skill is incomplete until that time is up. Anything that happens before that time is 'failing repeatedly'. I'm saying that as written, Take 20 means you fail repeatedly until eventually succeeding with a result calculated as though you had rolled a 20... even if you could normally succeed on a roll of 1. -Hyp. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Can you "Take 20" to Hide?
Top