Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can you twin booming blade
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Esker" data-source="post: 7906708" data-attributes="member: 6966824"><p>One of the main things that balances the blade cantrips is that you can't use extra attack if you use them, since they require the 'cast a spell' action. </p><p></p><p>It's true that by making the casting time one reaction you're imposing a cost in addition to the benefit of being able to stack it with extra attack, but the effect of this is to make the cantrip worse for characters that would previously have used it instead of extra attack (also for characters who use bonus action spells, since this is no longer a 'cantrip with a casting time of one action' and thus can't be used on the same turn), and better for characters that would not have cared about having it because extra attack is better for them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, but a monk can be holding a staff in one hand and make unarmed strikes with the other. Having a weapon be a material component doesn't mean you have to use that weapon on the attack. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There was: both Flurry of Blows and the Martial Arts bonus attack require the attack action, which booming blade does not involve. So a monk could technically use it with their monk weapons, but it would be nearly pointless since (a) they'd have to give up their second attack, and (b) they'd have to give up their bonus action attack(s).</p><p></p><p>On top of that, monks don't have all that much that uses their reaction.</p><p></p><p>So if you change the casting time to 1 reaction, which you take when you hit with a melee weapon, a monk is virtually guaranteed to get the bonus damage most turns, since they're often making 4 attacks and are very unlikely to miss all 4. That makes the value of the cantrip very nearly a full 4.5 (assuming Tier 2); whereas as it is written, the value is 4.5 times your to-hit chance, and even then only if you wouldn't have made more than one attack.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Esker, post: 7906708, member: 6966824"] One of the main things that balances the blade cantrips is that you can't use extra attack if you use them, since they require the 'cast a spell' action. It's true that by making the casting time one reaction you're imposing a cost in addition to the benefit of being able to stack it with extra attack, but the effect of this is to make the cantrip worse for characters that would previously have used it instead of extra attack (also for characters who use bonus action spells, since this is no longer a 'cantrip with a casting time of one action' and thus can't be used on the same turn), and better for characters that would not have cared about having it because extra attack is better for them. Yes, but a monk can be holding a staff in one hand and make unarmed strikes with the other. Having a weapon be a material component doesn't mean you have to use that weapon on the attack. There was: both Flurry of Blows and the Martial Arts bonus attack require the attack action, which booming blade does not involve. So a monk could technically use it with their monk weapons, but it would be nearly pointless since (a) they'd have to give up their second attack, and (b) they'd have to give up their bonus action attack(s). On top of that, monks don't have all that much that uses their reaction. So if you change the casting time to 1 reaction, which you take when you hit with a melee weapon, a monk is virtually guaranteed to get the bonus damage most turns, since they're often making 4 attacks and are very unlikely to miss all 4. That makes the value of the cantrip very nearly a full 4.5 (assuming Tier 2); whereas as it is written, the value is 4.5 times your to-hit chance, and even then only if you wouldn't have made more than one attack. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Can you twin booming blade
Top