Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Candlekeep Mysteries: Mazfroth’s Mighty Digressions ethics issues
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 8353679" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>[USER=6801845]@Oofta[/USER], it's obvious that this is a pretty touchy topic for you. It's also obvious that you haven't actually read the module and you are making decisions based on very limited information. Please, if you want to actually contribute, take the time to read the module instead of constantly having to be corrected because you haven't.</p><p></p><p>The following things are true:</p><p></p><p>1. No one has died.</p><p>2. Gingawazim are a small aberration. While it is true they could kill someone, that's true of lots of things. If I sell you a horse and that horse kills someone, am I culpable? Obviously not. So, comments about "loaded guns" and the like are not really applicable here. </p><p>3. The ONLY reason that this particular Gingawazim attacks the PC's is that it was ordered to stay in book form and was thus starving. Had it been allowed to hunt, it likely would have fed on stuff smaller than itself - ie. tiny stuff. Not many things normally try to eat stuff that's bigger than it is.</p><p>4. No laws were broken in Candlekeep save the entrance law. In fact, Candlekeep does not have any real legal system. Anyone who breaks rules is just banished from Candlekeep. Full stop. Kill someone in Candlekeep? They just push you out the door, never to return. </p><p>5. Baldur's Gate has been detailed in the Avernus adventure, which, I presume, includes Baldur's Gate's approach to legal issues. So, claims about canon not applying anymore are false. </p><p>6. AFAIK, no laws were broken in Baldur's Gate. Maybe, maybe, you might get a fraud charge to stick and that's it. If Baldur's Gate even HAS a fraud statute. No one was injured or harmed in Baldur's Gate. So, any legal issues won't be resolvable in Baldur's Gate. Nor, unless the DM grants it, does the party have any legal standing. Candlekeep simply wants the books back. Other than that, they don't really care. No one in Baldur's Gate would care, frankly, that non-citizens got fleeced at a market. </p><p></p><p>No matter what, nothing the Amberdune group have done would even remotely warrant a death sentence. In fact, if you set this in Waterdeep as [USER=277]@jasper[/USER] did, then the party would actually be arrested and executed for killing within the walls of Waterdeep. Waterdeep doesn't have any self-defense or whatever defense. You kill someone in Waterdeep, you are going to the salt mines if they don't flat out execute you. There's no extenuating circumstances allowed at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 8353679, member: 22779"] [USER=6801845]@Oofta[/USER], it's obvious that this is a pretty touchy topic for you. It's also obvious that you haven't actually read the module and you are making decisions based on very limited information. Please, if you want to actually contribute, take the time to read the module instead of constantly having to be corrected because you haven't. The following things are true: 1. No one has died. 2. Gingawazim are a small aberration. While it is true they could kill someone, that's true of lots of things. If I sell you a horse and that horse kills someone, am I culpable? Obviously not. So, comments about "loaded guns" and the like are not really applicable here. 3. The ONLY reason that this particular Gingawazim attacks the PC's is that it was ordered to stay in book form and was thus starving. Had it been allowed to hunt, it likely would have fed on stuff smaller than itself - ie. tiny stuff. Not many things normally try to eat stuff that's bigger than it is. 4. No laws were broken in Candlekeep save the entrance law. In fact, Candlekeep does not have any real legal system. Anyone who breaks rules is just banished from Candlekeep. Full stop. Kill someone in Candlekeep? They just push you out the door, never to return. 5. Baldur's Gate has been detailed in the Avernus adventure, which, I presume, includes Baldur's Gate's approach to legal issues. So, claims about canon not applying anymore are false. 6. AFAIK, no laws were broken in Baldur's Gate. Maybe, maybe, you might get a fraud charge to stick and that's it. If Baldur's Gate even HAS a fraud statute. No one was injured or harmed in Baldur's Gate. So, any legal issues won't be resolvable in Baldur's Gate. Nor, unless the DM grants it, does the party have any legal standing. Candlekeep simply wants the books back. Other than that, they don't really care. No one in Baldur's Gate would care, frankly, that non-citizens got fleeced at a market. No matter what, nothing the Amberdune group have done would even remotely warrant a death sentence. In fact, if you set this in Waterdeep as [USER=277]@jasper[/USER] did, then the party would actually be arrested and executed for killing within the walls of Waterdeep. Waterdeep doesn't have any self-defense or whatever defense. You kill someone in Waterdeep, you are going to the salt mines if they don't flat out execute you. There's no extenuating circumstances allowed at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Candlekeep Mysteries: Mazfroth’s Mighty Digressions ethics issues
Top