Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Careful Attack/Sure Strike: A mathematical analysis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4494903" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Of course.</p><p></p><p>But, how helpful is that? +2 is a 10% change in result. That means that 10% of the times that it is tried, it helps. 90% of the time, nothing changes.</p><p></p><p>So, the Fighter does less damage for 10 rounds (in the example above, that's 20.25 less average damage) in order to pull off a little extra damage from an encounter or daily power along with a special once. Most encounter and utility attacks do not do 20 points of damage more than an At Will power.</p><p></p><p>And, these numbers assume that the Fighter will actually get to use an encounter or utility attack 100% of the time after using the modified Sure Strike. There are times where the extra damage of a more potent At Will would have killed the opponent. There are times where the special of a different At Will would have helped more. There are times where the Fighter is Stunned or has some other condition on the next round where he cannot follow up.</p><p></p><p>Sure, it can help on occassion. But typically, it won't. Typically, the result is that the Fighter averages less damage in the same time frame using that option which means that the party on average uses up more resources with a Fighter using such an option.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 4494903, member: 2011"] Of course. But, how helpful is that? +2 is a 10% change in result. That means that 10% of the times that it is tried, it helps. 90% of the time, nothing changes. So, the Fighter does less damage for 10 rounds (in the example above, that's 20.25 less average damage) in order to pull off a little extra damage from an encounter or daily power along with a special once. Most encounter and utility attacks do not do 20 points of damage more than an At Will power. And, these numbers assume that the Fighter will actually get to use an encounter or utility attack 100% of the time after using the modified Sure Strike. There are times where the extra damage of a more potent At Will would have killed the opponent. There are times where the special of a different At Will would have helped more. There are times where the Fighter is Stunned or has some other condition on the next round where he cannot follow up. Sure, it can help on occassion. But typically, it won't. Typically, the result is that the Fighter averages less damage in the same time frame using that option which means that the party on average uses up more resources with a Fighter using such an option. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Careful Attack/Sure Strike: A mathematical analysis
Top